people saying vertigo introduced them to u2 finally makes me realize how people would have felt when i said that achtung baby introduced me to u2... old. very old.
You can hate on ATYCLB, HTDAAB and the best-ofs as much as you want but a lot of people on Interference, myself included, are fan because of these albums.
people saying vertigo introduced them to u2 finally makes me realize how people would have felt when i said that achtung baby introduced me to u2... old. very old.
Duuuuude. You're old! *pointsandlaughs*
Yes U218 is to help gain new fans. It worked for me! After I got HTDAAB for Christmas I kept listening to that on repeat. That summer I finally discovered JT. That was the only U2 I knew about. For some reason I didn't keep going on discovering more of their material, that is until U218. My dad had it in the car and he played it a lot when he took me somewhere. I took the CD out and played it countless times listening to the whole thing. I remember we took a long 6 hour drive to the mountains and I just played U218 and HTDAAB. After U218 I decided I was gonna love this band forever and I slowly collected their albums. I was already a fan but U218 helped my fandom (is that a word?) grow! I'm now a crazy die-hard, and it's because of two CDs, Bomb and, mainly, U218.
So don't hate on these 'Best Of' CDs. They can really grab people's attention.
Best of 1990-2000 was simply unacceptable.
I mean, best of 1980-1990 was perfect for me. Sure, I hate 'when love comes to town', but still it fits on the compilation.
With 1990-2000, you have BD and Stuck on there, which should have been saved for 2000-2010! It is an absolute joke that BD and Stuck took up 2 slots that could have gone to other 90's songs. I'm not the greatest lover of The Fly, but still it really should have been on there, as it defined the 90's sound of U2, not to mention it was a number 1, and a very famous U2 song. Wild Horses, while not a big hit, is a beautiful song, and was a single. That could have gone on there. And then you've got the HORRIBLE pop remixes. The re-done versions of discotheque and staring at the sun sound terrible. They were completely ruined. What the hell was wrong with the originals? They should have put the original recordings of those songs on, far superior.
Honestly, U2 messed up bad with 1990-2000, and so as a result they should not do 2000-2010. First of all, it would be most odd to have Elevation and Walk On on there without BD and Stuck... Secondly, they hardly have anything else they could put on there. A couple of singles from HTDAAB, and a couple from NLOTH.... but then again, why should Magnificent and Crazy Tonight go on? They were chart failures.
They'd go on there because it's a Best Of, not a greatest hits. Best of compliations are what the band feels are it's strongest tracks, they dont have to do with chart success..although sometimes both.
Best of 1990-2000 was simply unacceptable.
I mean, best of 1980-1990 was perfect for me. Sure, I hate 'when love comes to town', but still it fits on the compilation.
With 1990-2000, you have BD and Stuck on there, which should have been saved for 2000-2010! It is an absolute joke that BD and Stuck took up 2 slots that could have gone to other 90's songs. I'm not the greatest lover of The Fly, but still it really should have been on there, as it defined the 90's sound of U2, not to mention it was a number 1, and a very famous U2 song. Wild Horses, while not a big hit, is a beautiful song, and was a single. That could have gone on there. And then you've got the HORRIBLE pop remixes. The re-done versions of discotheque and staring at the sun sound terrible. They were completely ruined. What the hell was wrong with the originals? They should have put the original recordings of those songs on, far superior.
Honestly, U2 messed up bad with 1990-2000, and so as a result they should not do 2000-2010. First of all, it would be most odd to have Elevation and Walk On on there without BD and Stuck... Secondly, they hardly have anything else they could put on there. A couple of singles from HTDAAB, and a couple from NLOTH.... but then again, why should Magnificent and Crazy Tonight go on? They were chart failures.
They'd go on there because it's a Best Of, not a greatest hits. Best of compliations are what the band feels are it's strongest tracks, they dont have to do with chart success..although sometimes both.
U2:1980-1990
Pride - single
New Year's Day - single
With or Without You - single
Still Haven't Found - single
Streets - single
Unforgettable Fire - single
I Will Follow - single
Desire - single
Love Rescue Me - single
When Love Comes - single
All I Want is You - single
Sunday Bloody Sunday - single
Sweetest Thing - single, albeit released in 98
The only track on that album that wasn't a single was "Bad", but it was the song that took U2 to the next level, and was essentially the A-side on the Wide Awake in America EP.
U2:1990-2000
Real Thing - single
Beautiful Day - single
Mysterious Ways - single
Electrical Storm - released as single in 2002
One - single
Miss Sarajevo - single
Stay - single (and another single of theirs to miss the top 40...Magnificent wasn't the only one)
Stuck - single
Discotheque - single
Staring at the Sun - single
Numb - single
Only three songs on this Best Of weren't singles -- Gone, End of the World, and Hands that Built America. I suspect that Gone was primarily included because they had remixed it and needed to put it somewhere, and since Hedges had already remixed Discotheque and Staring at the Sun, it made sense. (Does anyone if he also remixed the never-released remix of Playboy Mansion that was rumored to be released as a B-side?)
So while I don't disagree that the Best Ofs aren't *just* a collection of the singles, they sure primarily are...
I think you mean Angel Of Harlem rather than Love Rescue Me right?
Also, Stay DID make the top 40 - it got to number 4.
So which singles did not make the 2 best ofs then (or u218)? Many of these songs, IMO, are far better than some of the stuff included on the 2 best ofs (it's mainly the 90's songs I'm talking about here)
Best of 1990-2000 was simply unacceptable.
I mean, best of 1980-1990 was perfect for me. Sure, I hate 'when love comes to town', but still it fits on the compilation.
With 1990-2000, you have BD and Stuck on there, which should have been saved for 2000-2010! It is an absolute joke that BD and Stuck took up 2 slots that could have gone to other 90's songs. I'm not the greatest lover of The Fly, but still it really should have been on there, as it defined the 90's sound of U2, not to mention it was a number 1, and a very famous U2 song. Wild Horses, while not a big hit, is a beautiful song, and was a single. That could have gone on there. And then you've got the HORRIBLE pop remixes. The re-done versions of discotheque and staring at the sun sound terrible. They were completely ruined. What the hell was wrong with the originals? They should have put the original recordings of those songs on, far superior.
Honestly, U2 messed up bad with 1990-2000, and so as a result they should not do 2000-2010. First of all, it would be most odd to have Elevation and Walk On on there without BD and Stuck... Secondly, they hardly have anything else they could put on there. A couple of singles from HTDAAB, and a couple from NLOTH.... but then again, why should Magnificent and Crazy Tonight go on? They were chart failures.
I know. It's just that Magnificent and Crazy Tonight did REALLY bad in the charts. I mean, they were the band's worst performing singles in years. Magnificent completely missed the top 40, first time that's happened since 1982 (A Celebration)