Maoilbheannacht
Refugee
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2005
- Messages
- 2,400
The only figure where BJ outgrossed U2 away from home. BJ ticket average is $149 vs. U2's $127. Obvious u2 outstrip BJ in all the other numbers.
While U2 promoter/fans will correctly cite too many major act saturating down under that season, why did BJ do so relatively "well" in Sydney while playing the same week? BJ trucks must have been waiting outside the venue for the last 360 truck to leave the dates are so close.
Did the 6 weeks headstart in announcing Aussie dates give that much of an advantage to Bon Jovi?(early July for BJ, late August for U2). Without Bono's injury stuff and if U2 announced before BJ would they have done even bigger number throughout the continent? Is saying u2 lost upwards of $10mil potential gross with late(ish) tour announcement out of line?
1. U2 were there on a large scale tour just four years earlier in Australia. Bon Jovi had not done a stadium tour on that scale in Australia since 1995.
2. Bon Jovi played a smaller venue in Sydney. This allows for more shows to be played which has a helpful impact on overall gross and attendance due to multiple show attendances by fans.
3. U2 played 8 stadium shows in Australia as opposed to 6 stadium shows and one arena show by Bon Jovi. With so many U2 shows outside of Sydney, there was less demand for fans to travel to Sydney for shows. On the other hand, half of Bon Jovi's stadium shows were in Sydney.