Zooropa man
Refugee
I like the leaked clip better.
true dat (bitching about a b-side)
different opinions are always good, esp when expressed in a polite way!
U2 actually managed to choose a song as a B-side that is better than the A-side of the single?
And release a remix before the original song?
Hmm, I definitely like it but can understand why this is a b-side. I'm sure I'll love the layered version a lot more
I love the squiggly keyboard parts that pop up every now and then. The rhythm section sounds good too.
The only problem I have is that Bono seems to be pushing his voice WAY TOO HARD. Sometimes he really brings something to the song by singing with a lot of passion, but here I'm finding myself cringe a little as he has trouble even singing his own melody. He sounds way outside of his voice's comfort zone. His singing during the bridge is actually a little embarassing. I can just hear a non-U2 fan listening to this and laughing during the bridge. This is probably nitpicking, especially for a b-side, but I think I'd like the song better if the voice was a little lower in the mix and the rest of the song was brought to the forefront. Even though the rhythm is pretty rocking, I think the reason people might find it boring is because it's so quiet compared to Bono's voice.
Sorry for the bitching part, but I do like the song.
Okay, I haven't been able to read this entire thread and didn't listen to the 30 second Walmart clips.
The song that premiered today is not the album version of the song? It's an alternate version that is on the b-side of the GOYB single?
If this is the case, I think I will listen, but I want to be clear. Can someone please confirm?
Loving the bass and drums
It's not a remix...
What's the difference? Just because it doesn't say "remix"? It's a sped up version of the album clip we heard with funny sounding keyboard noises, an almost dancey beat and shouted out "No" and "Line" words... sounds pretty much like a remix of the album version to me.
And it is indeed odd that they released the remix before the original version!
It's a completely different recording, taken with different instruments, hence not a remix
While technically true, it does sound a hell of a lot like a straight-up remix.
Man, this song is raising my adrenaline. It makes me want to dance dance dance. And that's really something.
Holy crap....this is awesome! I thought the beat at the beginning was Blondie. If people wanted a different U2 from the last two records, they got it! Recognisable U2 sound but this is totally new, with splashes of AB in there and some 80s. Wow.
But this would be like calling different takes of the song a remix, when they're just different takes. We don't know how big the differences will be but they are there.
But this would be like calling different takes of the song a remix, when they're just different takes. We don't know how big the differences will be but they are there.