I'm just saying, you introduced a fairly meaningless statistic into the conversation by saying only two QBs over 34 have made the super bowl recently and neglected to mention that that represented the AFC for the vast majority of that time period. Not to mention leaving out how many QBs over 34 have been to the championship game recently, made the playoffs recently, won their division recently, etc. It's been a common talking point of the last several seasons, that there's a huge divide in the ages of the most successful QBs in the league. They're either in their first three/four seasons, or they're getting pretty deep into their 30s/40s.
At the end of the day, only two QBs are making the Super Bowl. And for a decade, those appearances were pretty much dominated by players over the age of 34 on one side of the league. Even if it was a single player most of the time, he is certainly NOT the only successful +34 QB in the league, unless we're going back to this idea that the only successful QB is a Super Bowl winning QB, to which I return to my thoughts on that topic from last week.
I just absolutely can't get behind the idea that Stafford's not going to make an impact on the Rams when he's been pretty much exactly the same player, statistically speaking, his entire career, on one of the worst teams in the history of the NFL. The worst team?