CrashedCarDriver
Refugee
its a thought that came to my head when i was reading the review of No Line on the Horizon
personally in my opinion no line on the horizon is an unsatisfying album which has U2 living in the past. so unsatisfied by the album it has been excluded from my own preferred "2009 Playlist on my Ipod" (all songs released in 2009)
and i have a few songs on my 2009 playlist as well (244 songs), mind you i like stuff by Bon Iver, Animal Collective and the Dark Was the Night compilation double cd, i couldnt find a place for pop music or U2 on that playlist
u2 wouldnt feel that left out, theres a chance a crap song from No Line on the Horizon might still come up, theres a 1 in 638 chance of that happening
but seriously back onto the point, i didnt find the album satisfying at all, and i see no reason why rolling stone magazine would give it five stars, simply because it is U2. what happened to having an impartial view? parochialism gets you nothing
personally in my opinion no line on the horizon is an unsatisfying album which has U2 living in the past. so unsatisfied by the album it has been excluded from my own preferred "2009 Playlist on my Ipod" (all songs released in 2009)
and i have a few songs on my 2009 playlist as well (244 songs), mind you i like stuff by Bon Iver, Animal Collective and the Dark Was the Night compilation double cd, i couldnt find a place for pop music or U2 on that playlist
u2 wouldnt feel that left out, theres a chance a crap song from No Line on the Horizon might still come up, theres a 1 in 638 chance of that happening
but seriously back onto the point, i didnt find the album satisfying at all, and i see no reason why rolling stone magazine would give it five stars, simply because it is U2. what happened to having an impartial view? parochialism gets you nothing