Vlad n U 2
Blue Crack Addict
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
- Messages
- 28,386
You all suck and I hate everyone of you.
My resistance to Radiohurrd discussion is futile.
My resistance to Radiohurrd discussion is futile.
You all suck and I hate everyone of you.
My resistance to Radiohurrd discussion is futile.
How about U2 finally just gives up on what the media fucking says about them?
I swear some of you act like U2 is some embarrassing family of yours. Fuck what the media says about them. If anything, they should release more albums sooner! Because eventually, they are going to call it quits!
In Rainbows is the most boring album I've ever heard. I got the new one in the mail the other day. I played it once and lost interest. FUCKING boring elevator music!
iota said:STOP TOURING.
MAKE ALBUMS.
PUT ALL OF THEIR ENERGY INTO CREATION.
The tours are getting BORING as hell. they need about 5 years of leisurely recording to get things flowing again. Release an album a year.
Oh, the lack of musical knowledge.
What kind of elevators are you riding in?
With all due respect, I recommend that you listen again. I thought it was that way the first time I listened to it, then picked it up again several months later, and now it's my favorite Radiohead album (and I like Radiohead a lot).
Please go out and experience more life and more music... PLEASE!!!
You all suck and I hate everyone of you.
My resistance to Radiohurrd discussion is futile.
iota said:I'm just saying that their last few albums have been stunted by their need to prop up an oversized tour. It would be interesting to see what they create without that kind of pressure.
According to rateyourmusic, I've heard over 1700 albums, and I would still rank In Rainbows up there in the top 100-150 or so. It's certainly Radiohead's second or third best album.
I have no idea what the context of this post is, so I don't know if your attitude is borne of satire (I hope it is). Guess talking about In Rainbows is better than coming up with business plans for U2, who we all know will just do the opposite regardless of logic.
I hope that they break up. They haven't put out a record without a bad song since 1993, and their bad songs have been increasing in frequency and getting worse. Well, Bomb is all bad songs, so NLOTH is a step up. While it has some very good songs, they seem to have run out of ideas. Look at all the lazy Edge-isms on their last three records, the "Stay" quoting outro on MOS, the uninspired, nonsensical lyrics. No Line had a few really good songs, and some very good lyrics, but the ones they made without Eno and Lanois are fucking garbage. Those guys saved the record, and have made u2 the band they are. U2 can't do it on their own any more; their tour is a greatest hits joke, Bono looks like a pathetic overweight old man in his leather suit (When he dresses normally, he looks pretty good)...the whole thing is just pretty sad.
If they stick around, I think they'd be best suited by regularly releasing EPs that are unified in sound and concept (NLOTH would have been an incredible 6-7 song EP), but they'lll probably put out a record in 2015. And it will be bad. So, they'll be gone for 4 years.
I hope that they break up.
I hope they go back in time and make it so that they never formed a band in the first place.I hope that they break up.
I really don't think you can accuse cobl of not listening to enough music as he is one of B&C's regular posters.
my guess is spring 2013
In Rainbows is widely regarded as one of the best albums of the noughties. HTDAAB not so much.It wasn't meant to be taken that seriously. I just found his comment to be the equivelant of someone saying HTDAAB is the best album they've ever heard, not only would I find that insulting to U2's catalog but to music in general.
BVS said:Well esentially you agree with me. If he listened to more music it probably wouldn't rank in his top ten.
In Rainbows is widely regarded as one of the best albums of the noughties. HTDAAB not so much.
Anyway, back on topic. A fourth quarter 2012 release at the earliest.