(10-21-2002) Review of U2's 'Best Of' - Stylus Magazine

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

HelloAngel

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Sep 22, 2001
Messages
14,534
Location
new york city
http://www.stylusmagazine.com/

Review of U2's 'Best Of'


U2
Even Better Than The Real Thing
Interscope
2002

Reviewed by: Edwin Faust





By no means am I a model U2 fan. With the exception of War, I never particularly cared for their 1980s work. I was in Junior High when they blew up with the Joshua Tree and I considered them to be a girlie band?akin to INXS but with the annoying addition of fervent self-righteousness. My opinion of them was further lowered by Rattle & Hum, which was a pitiful display of unoriginality and unrestrained ego. Jump a couple years later to High School and myself catching the premier of ?The Fly? video; the first single from their forthcoming album, Achtung Baby. The video and song was rocking and hip. I dug the whole ?Fly? image and Zoo TV. In my opinion, U2 had finally stopped taking themselves too serious and started to take their music seriously instead. The Brian Eno influence was audible on Achtung Baby as it had been for David Bowie and the Talking Heads in the past. U2 was tackling satire and sexuality and most importantly, a new sound for pop rock. Zooropa was even better, displaying a band that was in a creative spree and had the backbone to fully embrace it. They weren?t doing what was expected of them; they were experimenting and reinventing their sound and I was all about that. Jump a couple more years and you have the band already showing weariness on the over-worked yet under-delivering, Pop. Probably due to old age and greed, U2 decided to throw in the experimental towel after that and the result was their return to heart-on-sleeve declarations and arena rock anthems: ?All That You Can?t Leave Behind? or as I refer to it, ?All That You Can?t Stomach?. Recently, there was a press release announcing the band?s upcoming ?Best Of 1990-2000? compilation and I decided to write a review on the album based solely on the track listing. Being that U2 became one of my favorite bands in the early 1990s only to become one of my least favorite acts today, I felt I could give the most objective review an ex-U2 fan could give.


?Even Better Than The Real Thing? leads off the disk and remains a groovy piece of pop rock; proving that U2 did INXS far better than INXS ever did. There is a definite logic in selecting this song as the first song on a ?Best Of? album; it?s the same logic that bestowed ?Pride (In The Name Of Love)? the honor of leading off Best Of 1980-1990. Like ?Pride?, ?Even Better Than The Real Thing? is a hit that wasn?t the first song on the album it was originally on. Also like ?Pride?, ?Real Thing? is a ?what it?s all about? song. Not ?what it?s all about? in a what it?s all about sense; I mean what U2 is all about or more specifically, what U2 is all about within the confines of the selected chronology of this compilation. Anyhow, that?s how I think the focus group put it to U2. Not surprisingly another hit from Achtung Baby follows?perhaps the biggest??Mysterious Ways?, which features the Edge playing funk guitar?funk guitar that actually sounds good! Remember in ?Rattle In Hum? when Bono screamed, ?play the blues? and the subsequent sound from the Edge?s guitar was whiter than Martha Stewart going antiquing in a blizzard. Apparently, between Rattle & Hum and Achtung Baby, the Edge smoked himself some phat chronic. Then comes their most recent smash hit: ?Beautiful Day?. The first verse of this song isn?t bad at all; I remember when I first heard it and was happy to hear the return of Brian Eno in the band?s production. Smooth, subtle, sophisticated. Then they hit that god-awful chorus, which had the Edge pounding out those lunkhead, arena rock power-chords and Bono yelping out lyrics Corky from ?Life Goes On? could have come up with. I had the same impression when hearing the song, ?Last Night On Earth? (from Pop). An atmospheric opener and Sonic-Youth-esque first verse, then a lunkhead ?rock out? chorus that made me go ?what the fu?!??


?ELECTRICAL STORM? is the mandatory new song that always inhabits a greatest-hit compilation, equipped with pointless and pretentious capitalization (kind of a reverse nine inch nails thing going on here). I saw the video for this song and managed to also hear the song while watching. Similar formula as ?Beautiful Day?; in fact, I think U2?s focus group dropped the ball on the track sequencing here?why juxtapose two songs that sound similar? U2 must have used the same team that decided the lopsided track sequencing for Pop. Subsequent is another Achtung Baby hit?the moving and frequently played ?One?. Obviously, U2 and their focus group were conscious in stacking all the big hits early on the album. Why? Don?t ask me. My thinking is the person who bought the album is the last person you need to be selling to. Next is a bit of a surprise, a track from The Passengers album: ?Miss Sarajevo?. Many people forget that whole endeavor. Heck, I even remember Larry and Adam?s new Mission Impossible theme?I have too much meaningless information in my head. ?Miss Sarajevo? is a nice bite off the Velvet Underground, though VU would?ve had the good sense to keep the obese opera-singer away from the recording studio. ?Stay (Faraway, So Close!)? is a horrible title, but a decent pop rock ballad. U2?s middle-of-the-road attempt at light soul, ?Stuck in a Moment You Can't Get Out Of? has a superior title, but lacks the spark of ?Stay?. When they did the NFL tie-in video for this song, I knew without any doubt whatsoever that U2 had become?well, whores. Probably thinking ?All That You Can?t Stomach? hasn?t moved all the units it still has potential to move, the U2 team decided to give cynical listeners like myself a break by placing only two cuts from that maudlin collection, which Rolling Stone inanely declared ?a masterpiece?.


The Rest of Best Of 1990-2000 focuses primarily on their 1997 effort Pop or more appropriately, Pop: The Special Edition. ?Gone? is a non-offensive yet forgettable song; Flood produced this Pop track sans Brian Eno (who was so disgusted by the Edge?s mid-life crisis guitar playing, he refused to produce the album). Do you want to hear my impersonation of Flood at work in the studio? Okay. Flood: ?Sounds great, but let me intentionally overheat the track with loads of fuzz.? After Pop received mix reviews from critics and record-buyers, U2 started bitching about the production in the press?a production they had several years to work on. I find it hysterical that every track from Pop on the ?Best Of? is a ?new mix?; clearly, since Pop was considered a failure (even though it still went platinum) the band had to blame it on something, being the politicians they have become. Don?t even ask me why four guys who have been professional musicians for over twenty years are so reliant on the right team of producers. I guess U2 and Aerosmith have more in common than most would think. You?ll notice that the songs from popular albums like Achtung Baby and ?All You Can?t Stomach? don?t have the ?new mix? surgery performed on them. My prediction for the new mix of ?Gone? is this: lower fuzz, higher Bono.


One of the cooler selections is ?Until The End Of The World? from Achtung Baby in place of the hit single, ?Who?s Going To Ride Your Wild Horses?. However, since this song was used heavily in NFL spots, it may not be all that cool. In fact, I know it?s not cool. Not anymore. U2 ruined one of their best songs and for what? A little bit of money. Anything connected to their NFL tie-in would be forever tarnished. It?s funny that some fans thought U2 sold-out when Bono started wearing fly-glasses and their music started to possess sensuality and wit. The big sell-out didn?t come until ?All You Can?t Stomach?, when they started sounding like Train and they played the NFL show sponsored by E-Trade. U2 has brought new meaning to the phrase corporate rock. After ?End Of The World? is another new track: ?The Hands That Built America.? Read that title again. Moving on.


Then it?s back to the Pop remixes; namely ?Discotheque?. The original version was one of Flood?s better productions; the fuzz and mid-life crisis guitar put to really good use; one of their funkier songs; up there with ?Mysterious Ways? and ?Daddy?s Gonna Pay For Your Crashed Car?. When I first saw the video for this, I had high hopes for Pop (despite thinking the Village People thing was exceedingly lame and obvious). Needles to say, these hopes were shattered when I finally heard the lackluster effort. However, my disappointment in Pop would help prepare me for even more profound disappointments (e.g. the Star Wars Prequels). Following is the similar yet meatier ?Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me? from the Batman Forever soundtrack. Starting from ?The Fly? to this song, U2 had released a string of videos and songs that made me think they could do no wrong. ?Hold Me, Thrill Me? is a raw yet stylish rocker with a tenacious hook and beat. Say what you will about Batman Forever, it?s better than Tomb Raider and ?Hold Me, Thrill Me? wipes the floor with ?Elevation? (U2 sounding simply like INXS as opposed to superior INXS). The next selection, ?Staring At The Sun?, is the song that caused me to realize the streak was over; I was with a friend when first listening to Pop and he blew up laughing when he heard the Edge do his shameless George Harrison impression. This song was U2?s attempt at being Oasis, but far more contrived; any song that has an anthem chorus is contrived by definition. Little did I know that a couple years later they would release ?Walk On? and trite anthems would be taken to a new low. My prediction for the new mix of ?Staring At The Sun?: lower Oasis, higher Bono.


Finally we get another hit of Zooropa with ?Numb?. I always thought this song was a clever little ditty; if the Beatles had done it, critics and fans alike would have praised it for its eccentricity; but living in the age of dulldom, many people just thought it was ?shallow? and that U2 should return to their Hallmark posturing. In my opinion, ?Numb? reflects our culture far better than ?Where The Streets Have No Name?. Of course, since a lot of their old school fans were weirded out by the more cutting-edge Zooropa tracks, U2 decided to do a new mix of this one as well (I wonder: when four songs are remixes, does a ?Best Of? become a ?Re-Mix? album? Perhaps I should give P.Diddy a ring and ask him). My prediction for this remix is this: the cool synth breakdown is replaced with an inflated guitar solo, Bono sings the song instead of the Edge and he belts out the following chorus: ?It?s really numb, don?t it make you dumb!?


Another Zooropa track concludes the CD, but ?The First Time? is definitely an unexpected and questionable choice. Which has been typical of U2?s actions in recent years, Zooropa gets the biggest screw-over with this so-called ?Best Of?. ?The First Time? is a nice enough song in the context of the Zooropa album, but for some reason I?m reminded of the Pop-Mart Tour in which they had a giant lemon but failed to perform the song ?Lemon?. In fact, they failed to perform any song from Zooropa on that tour, even though the material worked better with the Pop-Mart theme than any of the songs they played. It wasn?t a question about representing the songs live either, because I?ve seen a recorded performance of them doing half the Zooropa album live during their European Zooropa Tour (the one where Bono became Macphesto) and the songs sounded great. I?m also reminded of Bono being on Charlie Rose, during the promotion of ?All You Can?t Stomach?, and being disgusted by Bono feeling the need to justify the Zooropa period and explain that it was the band getting ?too European?. Too European! Call me close-minded, but I like my Europeans acting and sounding European; to me that seems honest and sincere?not humping America?s leg like a capitalist dog in heat. But Bono is obsessed with making Americans love him and as such, Zooropa cannot be represented properly on their ?Best Of?. By choosing, ?Stay? and ?The First Time? (the only two songs that echo U2?s traditional sound on Zooropa) and re-mixing ?Numb? (a song that was consistent with the overall Zooropa aesthetic), U2?the politicians they now are?have heeded the polls and covered-up their past controversies. The weird album that was ?too European? shall haunt those Joshua Tree fans no more.


Between the retooling of Pop and the misrepresentation of Zooropa, U2 has really become the George Lucas of pop music with ?Best Of 1990-2000?. Although George Lucas would never be pals with the likes of George Bush Junior, who Bono has publicly praised and politicized with; all in the name of ?saving the world? of course. I don?t forget the good ol? days when Bono cranked called George Bush Senior from the Zoo TV tour. Back then it wasn?t about being a gaudy politician; back then it was just about being a smartass rock star.


Alas, Bono is no longer smart?he?s just an ass.



Thank you, Michael Griffiths!
 
I think this guy is right on!

seriously, why change POP songs, when they were already rad!

why deny Zooropa all around, from the Popmart tour, and the new Greatest Hits?

and he is so right about "all that you can't stomach"

blah!!!

and... one last thing, I think U2 have sold out finaly, you know i can defend them for the past couple of years and all, but Etrade half-time show, and horrible greatest hits, and "all that you can't Stomach" makes them the ultimate corporate rock band.

sorry kids, and I wish this would never happen, but I have no control over their horrible decisions
im out
 
I didn't think All That You Can't Leave Behind was one of U2's best albums... I liked it though... I DID think Pop was one of their best albums... but I don't mind that they are remixing songs for their greatest hits album... because for fans like us it gives us new versions of the songs... and since Pop didn't do too well in the U.S., I guess it is another attempt at getting acceptance for those songs.

That article was interesting to read because sometimes I think that I am so into U2 that I'm not able to be objective anymore. You'll always find someone to oppose things... what really makes me think that this author just has something against U2 as opposed to being objective is his criticisms of Pop... I don't understand how the U.S. critics could have put that album down so much... I think it was amazing musically and from the standpoint of a rock band evolving and experimenting.

And I also don't consider U2 sellouts for doing things like the NFL half-time show. For U2, things like that are really a step down... and uneccessary, but I think that they want to get new fans (even though they don't need to... they sell out arenas and stadiums basically everywhere in the world already)... and I think they wanted to help out after that 9-11 stuff. Some of the things U2 has done I haven't really understood but I think this guy's criticisms were way out of line... although good ot hear his point of view. I personally don't listen to music critics one way or the other anyways.
 
Back
Top Bottom