BrownEyedBoy said:Someone on the Elevation DVD said the best show was on NYC but of course the cameras weren't there to record it.
Do it in NYC. U2 have a special thing going on with that city and I want the best concer possible to be recorded.
Klink said:I'm not sure what the benefit would be to filming a DVD in Vancouver. The whole point of making a DVD is to sell it. Like it or not, the US and Europe are the key target markets for U2 sales and markets prefer DVDs from venues/concerts closer to home or with some sort of special quality...ie. Boston has a huge Irish population. Dublin is their hometown.
Klink said:A
I'm not altogether sure why - in the context of a Canadian DVD - Montreal was left off people's lists in this thread, since the crowd makes it the most raucous show in North America and, just as it was on Elevation, it will be the loudest on the tour. If you want to show a U2 party, there's no competition from either of the above cities.
Jon
Chizip said:i think they should release the opener with a bonus feature dedicated to love and peace or else fan dancing
What are you talking about?Yahweh said:They have already been in Vancouver for days they went to Vancouver straight after Denver...I saw Bono on CBC doing an interview the other day.
stevec said:
Not sure about that Jon. There is a large Irish contingent in many cities throughout the world for sure, including my own hometown of Glasgow. Having said that, I can't quite see U2 or their management, basing a concert DVD simply on that town's Irish connections. Popmart in Mexico would be the obvious exception to that arguement I suppose.
Demographics aside, I think that crowd reaction is certainly part of it, tho' the overall performance during the show, quality of the sound and lighting, etc, are more likely to be the key elements in any final decision. A great crowd or a sympathetically Irish crowd is one thing, but if the show is not to U2 standards the cameras and microphones will reveal all. Like a U2 album, U2 won't put anything they consider to be less than their best on sale.
Where we go to a show, or a few shows and probably think they are the greatest, everybody will no doubt have that opinion about the one they attended. In theory, you would need to go to many shows, in several countries, comparing crowds, acoustics, lighting, location (i.e. stadia/arenas) to be able to say ONE in particular was best. U2 on the other hand, will be able to film as many or as few shows as they want/need, then decide which one will probably be best suited to broadcast or sale based on several different factors.
If a Vancouver or Montreal concert had all of the qualities they wanted in a possible DVD, that would be the one that ended up on the shelves. The same applies to any city on the tour.
Steve
ladywithspinninghead said:
Montreal IS loud and of the 9 Elevation shows it was easily the loudest (yes, surpassing Dublin, London, NYC, etc) but it's just noise. That's it. Hardly any singing at all!! I was disappointed in that regards but still a great show!
Anyhoo, I digress from the point of the thread...
Yahweh said:And based upon pure record sales data the US makes up about 37 percent of the world market for U2....in the 80s it was about 50 percent.