DubbalinGirl said:
The old Boston Garden was a sister building (Built by the same people at about the same time) to MSG. I saw U2 there twice, 9/87 and 3/92, and neither time could I understand a damn thing Bono said, and barely could make out lyrics to songs I didn't know (like cover versions). All these problems went away when they wisely tore down the old Garden and built the Fleet. I saw them play MSG in 10/01 and lo and behold, the same awful sound, the same exact look, old and decrepit, as the old Garden.
this thread makes me laugh... buuuuut i have to take exception to this particular post, because of it's factual inaccuracies in the above statement.
the old Boston Garden opened 1928. the current Madison Square Garden opened in 1968, replacing the previous Garden, which opened in 1926. The current Madison Square Garden is NOTHING like the old Boston Garden, and the fact that you said they were the same building makes me wonder if you've ever actually been to Madison Square Garden like you said. To start, MSG is round, the Boston Garden was rectangular. the interiors are not even remotely similar. The Boston Garden had a similar design to the old Chicago Stadium & the old Maple Leafs Garden, while Madison Square Garden is similar in design to The Forum in LA. And MSG also went over a $250 million dollar face lift in the mid 90s, and is in now way old and decrepit looking.
The Boston Garden was a great old building, and presented one of the greatest home court advantages in basketball history. The crowd was literally right up on the court. The visitor's locker rooms were dingy, dim pieces of crap... and they were kept that way on purpose, much like what was done at Chicago Stadium.
as you can see they aren't even remotely similar...
the boston garden and chicago stadium, however...
almost identical in design...
not that any of that matters...
boston did have a grasp on u2 before any other city in the US. that's fact, so it's no use arguing it. u2 were first popular on college radio. combine a large college population with a large irish population, and it's no wonder why u2 were big in boston first. that said, new york wasn't very far behind... their first concert in america was at The Ritz in Manhattan. i think everyone in the band except for adam has a place in or near new york city. they obviously have a love affair with BOTH cities, and arguing over who's city they have a bigger love for, or who's fans are bigger u2 fans... well, frankly that's stupid.
and for people arguing sports... well... i dunno what the hell sports has to do with the whole argument, but ok... i'll bite. new yorkers... sorry... we can't say shit. they've got the world series champion, they've got the super bowl champion... new york right now has shit. the yankees choked, the mets blow, the giants blow, the jets are about to get bounced by san diego... both the knicks and celtics equally stink and have no chance of beating the heat or any of the west teams... and hockey? well? frankly... who cares... they don't even play hockey anymore.
boston has the two most important american sport trophies in their clutches... until new york does the same, just shut up... you sound silly.
and as hewson could tell you... that took ALOT for me to say, 'cause i fricken hate every team in boston more than anything. but reality is reality, and ya can't lie about reality.
that said... i'd still recomend a show at MSG over the not so Fleet Center any day of the week.
and Hewson... I've got my $50 bucks ready... i say we make our bid.