martha said:
The assumptions you're making are mind-boggling.
You really think that people would not donate money to the Red Cross because Kanye West got emotional and said something of questionable taste? It seems to me that if people would allow that to influence their generosity at a time like this, they have deeper problems than we all want to think about.
But what you wanted him to say wasn't what he meant. He saw people in deep pain, in dire circumstances. He reacted.
I don't want to think about what you may mean by a comment such as this. Perhaps you are a bigger part of the problem Kanye was talking about than you want to admit.
How do you equate Jerry Lewis, the sponsor of the telethon, to Bush, NOT the sponsor of the telethon?
You're making tremendous leaps and assumptions to back up your claims. You know, you can be pissed and annoyed by Kanye's comments without resorting to elaborate arguements that don't make sense. It's ok to just be annoyed and pissed. Kanye was.
Tell me Kanye was responsible. Is that what you believe? In your heart of hearts you think that what he said was the correct thing at the correct time?
If so I respectfully disagree, that's all I'm saying. We're having a conversation here, don't start insinuating I have racist blood, that's not the level we're at here. It's difficult to talk about race issues in this format without using the terms associated with the issues. Using 'hood and 'burbs does not a racist make.
Do I think that someone may not have donated because of what Kanye said? Literally, no, I'm not that stupid. But how many people changed the channel? How many people did not change the channel and got into debates such as this in their living room and missed the rest of the program? I'm sure some people called their neighbor and said, did you just see Kanye and then tuned in. Your opinion that no one was dissuaded to donate based on his comments is just as arguable as mine saying that some were dissuaded. And I know what I wanted him to say isn't what he meant (obviously?). I was just saying that would have been a responsible response. Remember, we're talking about the responsibility of his comments. If he isn't helping the cause he's being irresponsible, that's the standard that has to be met or refuted in this argument. If you think otherwise, give me your opinion.
Tell me that rap music is not the dominant music listened to by the black youth community in low income neighborhoods. I think that's common knowledge and my stating that fact does not make me 'part of the problem', that makes me 'aware of the problem'.
I wasn't comparing Jerry Lewis to George Bush. I was illustrating that it would be just as irresponsible for someone to say what I posted in that context, as it was for what was said in the Kanye context. Two different contexts. Same irresponsibility. Subsititue anyone who appeared on the MDA telethon if you don't like the Jerry Lewis reference. Same point can be made.
Everyone else saw people in great pain and in dire circumstances, and no one else 'responded' like Kanye (on the TV show..
. Actually, there is a difference between responding and reacting. Responding requires comprehension and reason. Reacting is strictly emotional. I'm trying to respond via this post, where many who disagree with me just react and dispute without backing up their statements.
I want to hear where you are on this issue. Are you in the Kanye was responsible or irresponsible camp for calling George Bush a bigot on national TV? It's got to be one or the other. I don't want to assume you agree with Kanye if you don't.
And I'm asking that in the most intellectually positive way, I'm not trying to turn this into a hostile argument. I want to hear what your position is. Give it a shot.
I wouldn't take the time to post about this topic if I didn't have a genuine interest in the issue, BTW.