If a city has only 1 show....

[PhunkPhorce]

.... does it mean rather boring setlist "a la Brussels"? No bitching here, just want to know what you think. Or maybe there are some stats from current/previous tours?

 

[KUEFC09U2]

.... does it mean rather boring setlist "a la Brussels"? No bitching here, just want to know what you think. Or maybe there are some stats from current/previous tours?

why call it boring if your not bitching? some fans actually do like that setlist

 

[DubbalinGirl]

I don't know about boring, because that's very similar to what we got at Boston 1, and I liked it. However, I think if you go back and look through time you'll see that there's one setlist that is "standard" for first nights in a series and one-offs in a city. It just means no surprises, no shake-ups.

 

[PhunkPhorce]

Re: Re: If a city has only 1 show....

why call it boring if your not bitching? some fans actually do like that setlist

ok, if I say "rather boring as it was called by many ppl here in some threads related to Brussels show" would it be more appropriate? I'm not saying "boring=bad", I'm saying "boring=no surprises". So to rephrase my question: if I go to a show which is the only one in a city, is it true that more likely there will be a "standard" setlist without major surprises and shake-ups? And, more generally, does anyone know a show (from previous tours) that was full of surprises and shake-ups in spite of the fact that it was only one show in that city?