Bruce Springsteen is one of if not the most prolific song writer of the past 50 years.
He has B sides that he purposely kept off albums because he felt, rightfully so, that they would be too popular.
Imagine a song like Because The Night being held off an album. It was a top 10 billboard hit for two separate artists, yet the artist who wrote the song purposely kept it off the album.
Bruce is has and always will be a better songwriter than Bono, and that is not an insult to Bono whatsoever. Bruce Springsteen shits out songs that most artists wish they could write. He's a freak. Not being able to match his output is not an insult.
As for his recent works? Wrecking Ball showed that you can still be adventurous and experimental without pandering to the top 40 scene. It's an artist comfortable with who he is, and what he's done, and not caring about doing anything other than what he wants to do. This feeling is likely what's made his recent shows some of the best one's he's done since the Darkness tour.
That is the only Springsteen "thing" I wish U2 would do. not care about anything other than doing what they want to do. It will make their albums better.
Bruce Springsteen, the italian-dutch-irish american, has written more celtic sounding songs than the biggest band Ireland has ever produced. Why? Cause he doesn't care what anyone thinks of it. Dude put out an entire album of bluegrass just because he wanted to. And it was terrific.
This is what I want from U2. Just don't care. Do YOU. If The Edge can only write chimey guitar riffs now, but can make great songs out of it, minus any extravagant experimentation? Okay... Do it. If you want to make a trippy themed album, all atmospheric and shit? Okay... Do that.
This indecisiveness based on wanting to continue to appeal to "the masses" is infuriating.