PhilsFan
Blue Crack Addict
HahahahahahahaahahahaahahahahfasfhasdhfahffahfadfhafhThe GOP establishment and congressional leaders spend more time calling out and degrading Ted Cruz and the "wacko-bird" Tea Party than they do this president.
HahahahahahahaahahahaahahahahfasfhasdhfahffahfadfhafhThe GOP establishment and congressional leaders spend more time calling out and degrading Ted Cruz and the "wacko-bird" Tea Party than they do this president.
No surprise. You applaud when a solitary judge nullifies a popular vote, rewrites a constitution, and redefines marriage for an entire state. No surprise at all that you are pro-despot.
for a straight man, you're quite the drama queen.
Drama queen?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/13/anti-gay-jim-crow-comes-to-kansas.html
what's interesting is that what they are proposing is *exactly* what INDY has said anti-gay discrimination can't compare to: Jim Crow.
The older generation's fears and prejudices have given way, and today's young people realize that if someone loves someone they have a right to marry. I support the freedom to marry for all. That's what Loving, and loving, are all about.” — Mildred Loving, "Loving for All"
The 14th amendment was written specifically to address discrimination against ex-slaves. Where in the Loving Decision did it say, "this ruling applies to same-sex marriages also"?The judge opened her opinion with the quote, above, from Mildred Loving, the plaintiff in the 1967 challenge to Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage.
She thus joined a unanimous and ever-expanding collection of federal judges who have chosen to answer the question left up in the air by the Supreme Court last Spring
You really have no idea how the three branches of government work, do you.
Currently or as set forth in the Constitution with enumerated powers?
The 14th amendment was written specifically to address discrimination against ex-slaves. Where in the Loving Decision did it say, "this ruling applies to same-sex marriages also"?
So Debo Adegbile was blocked by the Senate for a position in the JD's Civil Rights division because Republicans didn't like that he had a history of fighting for civil rights.
Going against their better judgment because they thought it would hurt their re-election bids.Embarrassed of what?
Finally, why is this president attempting to pack the DOJ with leftist radicals?
Finally, why is this president attempting to pack the DOJ with leftist radicals?
What is it with leftist radicals and cop killers?