How come when the United States is accused of atrocities, the press has NO PROBLEM publishing photographs?
When terrorists strike, the press edits, blurs, places rocks...ect...
Why? Is it to diminish the effects of the terrorism? Is it to prevent people from reacting harshly towards the terrorists?
Does this bother anyone else? Or is it no big deal
The real photo:
The Guardian:
The Times:
The Telegraph:
Well, shouldn't journalists present the truth? Is this acceptable? Or is it only acceptable to show how bad the US is?
Just curious.
When terrorists strike, the press edits, blurs, places rocks...ect...
Why? Is it to diminish the effects of the terrorism? Is it to prevent people from reacting harshly towards the terrorists?
Does this bother anyone else? Or is it no big deal
The real photo:
The Guardian:
The Times:
The Telegraph:
Well, shouldn't journalists present the truth? Is this acceptable? Or is it only acceptable to show how bad the US is?
Just curious.