joyfulgirl
Blue Crack Addict
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2001
- Messages
- 16,690
Like Kerry would need to cheat, lol, when he's debating deer-in-the-headlights.
Did Kerry cheat at the debate?
- Thread starter Dreadsox
- Start date
The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
deep
Blue Crack Addict
joyfulgirl said:
It is just manna for their masses.
They must keep their base fired up.
If Kerry won, he must have cheated.
We all know the Lord annointed Bush to be President.
Dreadsox said:
Certainly, those supporting Kerry would like to think that their version of being nasty is somehow has more tactful, but its not. Senator McCain would agree with that and we know who Senator McCain supports and is campaigning for in this contest.
LoveTown said:
Leaving Saddam in power in light of his past behavior and capabilities would be a shame and serious threat to the region and there for the rest of the planet. There is a reason that Saddam had 17 resolutions passed against him, 3 of which authorized the use of military force if he failed to comply with the resolutions.
That is kind of amusing...I figured you would respond like that. How Mr. McCain can support Mr. Bush, makes him a better man than I. If I had been depicted in the manner the Bush machine portrayed him in the last election, I would not be able to see through it. As I said, he is a better man than I am.
And if you can show any example of Mr. Kerry or the Democratic party, not a 527 engaging in behavior equivalent to what Mccain went through, please present your case. As usual I have an open mind.
And if you can show any example of Mr. Kerry or the Democratic party, not a 527 engaging in behavior equivalent to what Mccain went through, please present your case. As usual I have an open mind.
verte76
Blue Crack Addict
Unfortunately I will miss the second debate. Friday night I'll be in Georgia at a medieval re-enactment event. I'm not complaining, though. I'm glad I have the re-enactment thing to break the tension. If I didn't take breaks from this stuff I'd go nuts. The news will be here when I come back.
Dreadsox said:
I've been following politics long enough to know that no side has the higher ground when it comes to slinging mud. All 527s are is a cover for the Democratic party machine to do its mud slinging.
Senator McCain realizes what is important for this country and is not going to let a past political campaign get in the way of that.
deep
Blue Crack Addict
Dreadsox said:
he is a loyal Republican..
I believe he personally despises Rove and this Administration
diamond
ONE love, blood, life
back to the topic.
if u click this link it does not look like a pencil.
maybe dan rather gave him some cheat notes
http://www.zombietime.com/kerry_at_first_debate/
if u click this link it does not look like a pencil.
maybe dan rather gave him some cheat notes
http://www.zombietime.com/kerry_at_first_debate/
Last edited:
BostonAnne
Refugee
diamond, where did you find a site called zombietime?
neutral
genius of compression, Forum Moderator
Last edited:
Wow, that is an awfully large and clear picture, neutral. I think you're misunderstanding, though. If you use small blurry pictures it is clearly a piece of paper that Kerry's pulling out of his pocket. Make this picture smaller and blurrier so that I can see the truth, please.
Last edited:
deep
Blue Crack Addict
maybe there was an "electronic device" in the pen
and everytime he pushed it
it made W shit himself*
*explains those funny expressions, doesn't it.
and everytime he pushed it
it made W shit himself*
*explains those funny expressions, doesn't it.
diamond
ONE love, blood, life
anne,BostonAnne said:
some friend sent it to me.
Back to the topic.
It's clear that he had a pen as he took copius notes of GW's oratory skills.
That still looks like a piece of paper in the clips though. You cannot get around that.
They could of been crib notes, cliff notes or a love letter from Mrs Ketchup.
db9
BostonAnne
Refugee
I couldn't tell anything diamond. When did this part happen?
diamond
ONE love, blood, life
Anne,
that happened thru out the night as he was constantly writing.
but the note thing happened quickly and rather inconspicously.
db9
that happened thru out the night as he was constantly writing.
but the note thing happened quickly and rather inconspicously.
db9
BostonAnne
Refugee
He put it in and out of his pocket all night?
Sorry, but I think this whole thing is quite silly. Nothing left to say in this thread.
Sorry, but I think this whole thing is quite silly. Nothing left to say in this thread.
The only possible way Kerry could have cheated was by not destroying Bush on a number of subjects. Bush claims to value the lives of American soldiers, yet he has not attended a single funeral for a fallen American soldier, and he has not permitted the media to fairly cover the war, such as restricting the right of the media to photograph returning American coffins from Iraq. If the public was more aware of American loses in Iraq, support for the war would diminish to levels lower than they are already!
The object of a debate is to refute one’s opponent’s arguments as best as possible. Kerry did not refute many of Bush’s arguments as best he could, thus cheating the American public out of a dramatic win for the Democrat!
The object of a debate is to refute one’s opponent’s arguments as best as possible. Kerry did not refute many of Bush’s arguments as best he could, thus cheating the American public out of a dramatic win for the Democrat!
diamond
ONE love, blood, life
BostonAnne said:
Sorry, but I think this whole thing is quite silly. Nothing left to say in this thread.
anne
i think you're right
db9
dlihcraw said:
Most of the military supports Bush and the American public is more aware of each individual loss than they have been in ANY war in history.
Lets remember that the American public has supported wars that had loss rates 20, 30, and over 40 times the current rate in Iraq.
STING2 said:
That's silly. The American public has supported slavery in the past too, but that doesn't mean that it's okay today. The American public has supported the prohibition of alcohol in the past. The American public has supported the disenfranchisement of women voters ... etc.
I'm glad that the troops aren't being killed at rates as high as past wars, but obviously what America put up with in the past might not be the same as what they'll put up with today.
And besides, half of all Americans now think that the war in Iraq was unnecessary.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6159637/site/newsweek/
DaveC
Blue Crack Addict
ThatGuy said:
neutral
genius of compression, Forum Moderator
ThatGuy said:
ThatGuy said:
So you think American support for World War II in the 1940s, The Korean War in the 1950s, and the Vietnam War until 1968 in the 1960s, is silly!?!?
Many of the people who lived through and or fought in those wars will be voting in this election!
The latest GALLUP poll shows that voters prefer:
Bush on Iraq!
51% for Bush 44% for Kerry
Bush on Terrorism!
56% for Bush 39% for Kerry
Bush on who is the strongest leader!
56% for Bush 37% for Kerry
Way to misinterpret my post and introduce irrelevent information STING!
What I said was, no matter what Americans once supported, America is free to change its mind about what it finds acceptable. The fact that America once supported wars with large numbers of dead does not mean that it will do so now. So your original point is moot (nay, silly). Was that clear enough? I typed it extra-slowly so you'd catch all of it.
What I said was, no matter what Americans once supported, America is free to change its mind about what it finds acceptable. The fact that America once supported wars with large numbers of dead does not mean that it will do so now. So your original point is moot (nay, silly). Was that clear enough? I typed it extra-slowly so you'd catch all of it.
Last edited:
ThatGuy said:
I don't think history is silly and its a good indicator of how a country and culture will react to new events. Yep, anyone can change their mind about anything at anytime, but realistically, recent history indicates what the most probable response will be.
America supports the war and is ready to vote for two candidates who both claim they will continue it.
That being said, the polling data shows who they think would best handle the war in Iraq.
Last edited:
Klaus
Refugee
STING2
Do you think the american public would still support the Iraq-war if it wasn't over and over again connected to 9/11 like the Administration does it?
Do you think the american public would still support the Iraq-war if it wasn't over and over again connected to 9/11 like the Administration does it?
Similar threads
