ZeroDude said:Man i feel like i want to shut you down but let the authourities decide this one
ZeroDude said:sorry, just keep it sane 1 more compare maximum is enough for anyone again sorry
djerdap said:Boy is a solid debut, but The Bomb blows it out of the water.
Catman said:lol, I don't know how ANYONE could say "Boy" is better. I mean, it's definately one of my favorite U2 albums (probably 2nd favorite of the 80's ), but HTDAAB is just MUCH more mature, with music created by men who know what they're doing and are comfortable with where they're at and what they've accomplished. On the other hand, "Boy" is, as one might expect, a tad "immature," if you will. Don't get me wrong, I think it is a surprisingly VERY cohesive effort considering how old the guys were, with some even more suprisingly REALLY good tracks. But honestly, when compared to HTDAAB, I don't think there is any competition
TheFlyOnTheWall said:
Yeah, but it was a bigger deal to make Boy back then (1980) than it's now releasing the Bomb... Bomb is just one of the albums... nothing so special... nothing so new...