Irvine511
Blue Crack Supplier
i think all countries were in agreement as to the available intelligence.
they did not all agree as to what action was appropriate in response to this intelligent.
i think it's safe to say that, while all mentioned countries could say, "yes, we believe, based upon the intelligence we have, that this is the situation." however, only ONE country thought a war was the correct response to this situation. only ONE country thought that SH and Iraq posed a clear and present danger (sorry, a "grave and gathering danger") to the US. only ONE country thought invasion was the solution to this country. and now, only ONE country has lost essentially all credibility.
the intelligence, in and of itself, is beside the point. it's what was done about the intelligence that matters.
they did not all agree as to what action was appropriate in response to this intelligent.
i think it's safe to say that, while all mentioned countries could say, "yes, we believe, based upon the intelligence we have, that this is the situation." however, only ONE country thought a war was the correct response to this situation. only ONE country thought that SH and Iraq posed a clear and present danger (sorry, a "grave and gathering danger") to the US. only ONE country thought invasion was the solution to this country. and now, only ONE country has lost essentially all credibility.
the intelligence, in and of itself, is beside the point. it's what was done about the intelligence that matters.