Ongoing Mass Shooting Thread #3... that's right, a third thread. Because 'Murica.

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
If "responding" is "taking your money and not making a difference," well that's a terrible response.

Zero lives saved, millions of dollars made. Sorry, not just gonna let that pass as "oof it's just the way it is, how unfortunate."
 
In 2012, Megan McArdle suggested that the best way to combat school shooters would be to train children to gang rush shooters. Six years later, she got hired by the Washington Post.
 
I've never found him convincing until the last few weeks. It's as if he's found something he believes in and you can tell. As opposed to just being everything to everyone.
 
It’s increasingly difficult to feel sympathy for the citizens of a state that has been the financial and geographical heart of the GOP for the past 30 years. It’s a bit of a reap/sow moment. What do people expect? More guns = more gun crime. In a state that actively promotes gun ownership and with a government that has been totally controlled by a terrorist organization that seeks to get as many Americans killed as possible, what do people expect?
 
It’s increasingly difficult to feel sympathy for the citizens of a state that has been the financial and geographical heart of the GOP for the past 30 years. It’s a bit of a reap/sow moment. What do people expect? More guns = more gun crime. In a state that actively promotes gun ownership and with a government that has been totally controlled by a terrorist organization that seeks to get as many Americans killed as possible, what do people expect?

As someone who has 2 Texans as friends; one is now here in nyc, the other in Texas - at least feel sympathy for the liberals, and progressives who live there. That's who both my friends are. :)
 
The orange menace is ranting about crowd size again.

"Certainly, if I went to Manhattan, if I went there — No. 1, she didn’t have 20,000 people and No. 2, I think anybody would get a good crowd there," he told reporters on Air Force One, according to a pool report. "I think you have a good crowd there if you don’t even go there, just say you’re going and how many people are in the park.”

I hear everyone loves him in Manhattan! Why doesn't he go back and have a rally with a million people then?
 
As someone who has 2 Texans as friends; one is now here in nyc, the other in Texas - at least feel sympathy for the liberals, and progressives who live there. That's who both my friends are. :)



I hear you. I was angry when I wrote that.

I’ve been to Texas a bunch over the years and I’m always surprised at how much I like it. It’s a rapidly changing state, and I know the cities are blue. And people are people, most of them good.

But there is a pervasive gun culture that that has to change if these things are to stop happening.
 
I'm working in a school and I'm dreading having to do the shooter drill. It's elementary so of course we don't call it shooter, it's "dangerous person". Even though the kids know exactly what it is and that is sad beyond any words.

What a sick situation
 
I'm working in a school and I'm dreading having to do the shooter drill. It's elementary so of course we don't call it shooter, it's "dangerous person". Even though the kids know exactly what it is and that is sad beyond any words.

What a sick situation

That's horrifying :|.

And yet adults can't figure out why young people have so many anxieties and whatnot nowadays. Gee. I wonder.

I was 14 when Columbine happened. I sure as hell wasn't expecting that we'd STILL be dealing with this issue twenty fucking years later.
 
it means sales are going to go way up for a bit because people want to get one before they're gone, production will stop and the price of new AR-15s will rise as supply drops, so colt can bring it back in two years "by popular demand" at a higher price to an even bigger sales frenzy, and then colt's share price will go up by at least 30%.

this will have absolutely no effect at all on the number of people dying by gunfire.
 
Last edited:
Another day, another school shooting in the US. Saugus High School in Santa Clarita CA. 16 year old girl dead, five injured. 16 year old boy pulled a pistol out of his backpack and shot others then shot himself in the head. He"s in grave condition.
 
I STILL marvel at the hypocrisy in this place where as soon as the gun control virtue signalers hear that the shooter wasn’t white, didn’t use an “assault rifle “, is in the liberal haven of California with strict gun laws......there is radio silence. Doesn’t fit the liberal narrative. Same with the Democratic politicians. They only care about victims when they can use it politically.
 
and look at you here deeply caring about the victims and totally not using them politically.

i STILL marvel at the hypocrisy every time you post.
 
I STILL marvel at the hypocrisy in this place where as soon as the gun control virtue signalers hear that the shooter wasn’t white, didn’t use an “assault rifle “, is in the liberal haven of California with strict gun laws......there is radio silence. Doesn’t fit the liberal narrative. Same with the Democratic politicians. They only care about victims when they can use it politically.

1. California's strict gun laws are great, but if the states around them don't have similar laws, then that's not enough. The whole point is to have better gun control nationwide.

2. Personally, I don't give a damn what kind of gun the kid used. The kid shouldn't have had access to any sort of gun in the first place, period. Assault rifles may be the main focus of late because they were involved in so many of the mass shootings, but that doesn't mean people are ignoring the issues with other guns.

3. Wow, he wasn't white. And Brenda Spencer was one of the rare females who went on a shooting spree. It's almost like there can be exceptions or something!

None of that negates the fact that as it currently stands, the majority of these kinds of shootings are committed by young white men. If people have no problem stereotyping every other race/ethnicity whenever somebody from those groups commits a crime, then they don't get to bitch and moan when young white men find themselves under that same microscope.

Also, I don't know what this young man's reasons for going on his shooting spree were, but I'm going to guess they were very different from people like, say, the El Paso shooter, or Dylan Roof, or the synagogue shooter from last year, or others of that sort. See, the motives for each type of shooting also tend to be a factor in the varied ways people discuss these crimes.

Next time you want to go around making presumptions about how liberals respond to this stuff, maybe try not misconstruing our arguments and mindsets in the process, mmkay?

And as for this

They only care about victims when they can use it politically.

Go look at your own party's numerous examples of doing this and then get back to us, kthx, bye.
 
I STILL marvel at the hypocrisy in this place where as soon as the gun control virtue signalers hear that the shooter wasn’t white, didn’t use an “assault rifle “, is in the liberal haven of California with strict gun laws......there is radio silence. Doesn’t fit the liberal narrative. Same with the Democratic politicians. They only care about victims when they can use it politically.



Tell me how many people died in California yesterday during this incident and then please go pull up the number of people who die in incidents where the perpetrator uses an “assault rifle” and then please get back to me.
 
I STILL marvel at the hypocrisy in this place where as soon as the gun control virtue signalers hear that the shooter wasn’t white, didn’t use an “assault rifle “, is in the liberal haven of California with strict gun laws......there is radio silence. Doesn’t fit the liberal narrative. Same with the Democratic politicians. They only care about victims when they can use it politically.



Thank you for your touching words of concern for the victims. Very gzus-like.
 
Tell me how many people died in California yesterday during this incident and then please go pull up the number of people who die in incidents where the perpetrator uses an “assault rifle” and then please get back to me.

Ok, I'm responding to this nonsense because Headache is waiting for me too. You are proving my point, so not enough people died in this tragedy for you? So you only talk about "saving the children" and "school shooting" when ten or more die? 20?

That's disgraceful. Either you are outraged by gun violence or you're not. You're proving my point, since only a few died, an "assault rifle" wasn't used, and one of the millions of NRA "white nationalists" wasn't the shooter, you don't care.

Welcome to the Democrat Party.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom