marik
Refugee
so i was listening to Electrical Storm today and had the following thought...
it is one of the best song U2 has made in the last couple yrs - since Pop. SO it occurred to me that the sales of the Best Of were NOT dependant on the "NEW" songs. i mean anyone buying the Best of would be a) a hardcore fan that had every song but would buy it anyways, or b) someone that 'kinda' likes a few U2 songs and wants a collection of their best known hits on one cd.
I don't think that many people bought the cd STRICTLY for Electrical Storm or Hands that Built America. If they were only buying it for those reasons they coulda bought the ES Single for much cheaper, or the Gangs of NY soundtrack.
SO basically U2 added 2 new songs just for the sake of being able to say '2 new songs'. the quality of the songs didnt really matter that much to the album's sales.
SO, my question is, would it have been better to save those 2 songs, specifcally ES, and put it on the new album- Atomic Bomb. And instead put two of the lesser quality tracks from Bomb onto the Best of in their place. Basically just swap 2 songs. (assuming that they could have had them all created back when Best of was being released)
you must consider the album flow, but i think it would have been a good idea. ES would flow pretty well after VErtigo in the beginning of the album to re-emphases the 'doubt/fear' concept of the album. As for Hands, it fits in nice and well in the live show, so i believe that it could be fit into the album flow somewhere. perhaps after Love and Peace, leading into City of Blinding Lights?
what songs shoulda been dropped to the best of then? perhaps Miracle Drug (would fit around the time that Bono started his public humanitiarian efforts) , or All Because of You (kinda like a thank you song to the fans to go along with the best of)
just a thought. comments?
it is one of the best song U2 has made in the last couple yrs - since Pop. SO it occurred to me that the sales of the Best Of were NOT dependant on the "NEW" songs. i mean anyone buying the Best of would be a) a hardcore fan that had every song but would buy it anyways, or b) someone that 'kinda' likes a few U2 songs and wants a collection of their best known hits on one cd.
I don't think that many people bought the cd STRICTLY for Electrical Storm or Hands that Built America. If they were only buying it for those reasons they coulda bought the ES Single for much cheaper, or the Gangs of NY soundtrack.
SO basically U2 added 2 new songs just for the sake of being able to say '2 new songs'. the quality of the songs didnt really matter that much to the album's sales.
SO, my question is, would it have been better to save those 2 songs, specifcally ES, and put it on the new album- Atomic Bomb. And instead put two of the lesser quality tracks from Bomb onto the Best of in their place. Basically just swap 2 songs. (assuming that they could have had them all created back when Best of was being released)
you must consider the album flow, but i think it would have been a good idea. ES would flow pretty well after VErtigo in the beginning of the album to re-emphases the 'doubt/fear' concept of the album. As for Hands, it fits in nice and well in the live show, so i believe that it could be fit into the album flow somewhere. perhaps after Love and Peace, leading into City of Blinding Lights?
what songs shoulda been dropped to the best of then? perhaps Miracle Drug (would fit around the time that Bono started his public humanitiarian efforts) , or All Because of You (kinda like a thank you song to the fans to go along with the best of)
just a thought. comments?