Chizip said:game swung when the rams got screwed out of the fumble recovery. the first ref signaled rams ball 3 times. then for some reason they change it on "dual possession?" gimme a break.
one ref signaled that it was rams ball, and he was the ref that you could see on camera the most, but just to the left of the screen you can pick up another ref who was at the same time signaling colts ball. thus the dual posession. never seen that before, but that's where the call came from.
was pretty wacky... ya saw the one guy signal rams ball, then the other ref from the left side of the screen signals colts ball, and then the first ref signals rams ball again... it was like a scene out of some bad sports comedy.
and to get the baseball thread back onto baseball...
Hewson in the baseball thread said:Well if Bulger doesn't get hurt, thats a much different game. The Rams may not win with the way their D performed in the second half, but its a lot closer. Bulger was leading the offense through the Colts D like a hot knife through butter before the injury.
actually, Bulger had just been intercepted by the Colts D on the very same play in which he got injured, and the momentum was clearly swinging back towards indianapolis.
but alas, we'll have to notch this one up as still yet another unporoven game for the questionable, over-rated indianapolis colts.
they could win every game by 50, it doesn't matter. patriot fans, much like yankee fans of old, won't give the colts, much like the red sox, any respect until they actually win in foxboro.
so alas... we wait.