diamond
ONE love, blood, life
What makes you so sure? This will involve years of legal challenges, but yes, the 16,000 same sex marriages performed in CA since June could be retroactively invalidated.
BS.
Bet you a soadie Rick.
<>
What makes you so sure? This will involve years of legal challenges, but yes, the 16,000 same sex marriages performed in CA since June could be retroactively invalidated.
There is an indespensible amount of money for liberal causes here in the States.
Fear not, the bigots will figure it out.
<>
Wait, the people for gay marriage are bigots? Huh? That's absurd. You're like a Kafka character.
BS.
Bet you a soadie Rick.
<>
I'd be interested to know what people here think about this: We are all told by many of the anti gay marriage people that civil union means the same thing as marriage. So if all state recognised marriages were nullified and changed to civil unions would you be cool with that?
That's not what he told me when I met him a cpl of times.
Have you ever met Bono, mr angry man?
<>
I'd be interested to know what people here think about this: We are all told by many of the anti gay marriage people that civil union means the same thing as marriage. So if all state recognised marriages were nullified and changed to civil unions would you be cool with that?
That's my whole point, apparently not.
<>
Scapegoating is scapegoating. Perhaps someone will argue that liberal support of gay marriage is 'reverse scapegoating' done expressly to harm social conservatives and their families.They just wanted to win over the Left and the liberals. At the expense of civil rights? So be it.
And what is your answer, dear? Are you ok with your marriage being called a civil union?
But they're too few in number for their private pain to qualify as a public concern, so, who cares I guess.
No. I like being married. I want others to be able to be married. My marriage is not so tenuous that it needs others excluded from having one.
BS.
Bet you a soadie Rick.
<>
PROPOSITION 8
This initiative measure is submitted to the people in accordance with the
provisions of Article II, Section 8, of the California Constitution.
This initiative measure expressly amends the California Constitution by
adding a section thereto; therefore, new provisions proposed to be added are
printed in italic type to indicate that they are new.
SECTION 1. Title
This measure shall be known and may be cited as the “California Marriage
Protection Act.”
SECTION 2. Section 7.5 is added to Article I of the California Constitution,
to read:
SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized
in California.
You have some anger issues pal.
I guess at the end of the day the whole issue comes down to a simple matter of dignity. From what I've heard from those opposed to it, they really don't have any idea what dignity really is - they don't know how dignity feels so they cannot grasp the desire to feel dignified. They will say they do, and they probably honestly believe they do, but they don't. Dignity is inner strength, compassion and courage. Bigotry is weakness, anger, fear, and ignorance. That shit leads to the dark side, Luke.
Let's not get into generalizing about people's intellects based on their denominational membership, please...there's enough to legitimately argue against here without resorting to that.i know your team was a little late to the game on on that whole annoying "racism" thing so it's no surprise you'd still be stuck in you rmedieval thinking.
Let's not get into generalizing about people's intellects based on their denominational membership, please...there's enough to legitimately argue against here without resorting to that.
no, marriage connotes opposite sexes.
<>