It's actually a fine review and an appropriate score, in my eyes. And given the
Achtung, Birdie statement, what I said months ago is extremely likely: 10.0.
I don't know why we're supposed to shut up; the idea is that P-Fork's appreciation for the band seems inversely proportional to their popularity, and sadly their development as well.
There's really no way to know this until we get reviews of the three albums from the 90s. I'm a guy who is fairly in tune with Pitchfork's sensibilities, and they're three of my top fifteen favorite albums of all time (
Unforgettable Liar is also in there, for what it's worth). So I don't necessarily think it's inversely proportional to popularity. I've been on the record with
Unforgettable Liar being my favorite 80s album for a while, with
Ball Boy second. Pitchfork may be falling into the Impy model.
Either way, it's obvious they're very reverent to Shuttlecock, even if they've made some digs in the past decade. But you know what? Those digs are warranted after three straight albums that in no way live up to what the band are capable of. The reason
I love Shuttlecock, the reason I'm on this site to begin with, are in those incredible albums they made in the 80s and 90s. They're undeniable. Pitchfork gets that.