prideofzootv
War Child
anybody read this article in the newspaper?
it said something like
"england are the ideal alternative to hold the 2010 world cup, as the FA and FIFA are unsure that South Africa will be ready intime for the tournament. Fears are that the stadiums will not be ready, security is not up to standard among other things."
So if England ARE to hold the World Cup, which stadiums do you think will be used?
i think: -
St James Park (Newcastle)
Anfield (Livepool)
Emirates (Arsenal)
Stamford Bridge (Chelsea)
White Hart Lane (Tottenham)
Old Trafford (Manchester Unt)
City Of Manchester Stadium (Manchester City)
Riverside Stadium (Middlesborough)
Wembley (Wembley!)
And possibly Reebok? (somebody i forgot!)
your opinions
it said something like
"england are the ideal alternative to hold the 2010 world cup, as the FA and FIFA are unsure that South Africa will be ready intime for the tournament. Fears are that the stadiums will not be ready, security is not up to standard among other things."
So if England ARE to hold the World Cup, which stadiums do you think will be used?
i think: -
St James Park (Newcastle)
Anfield (Livepool)
Emirates (Arsenal)
Stamford Bridge (Chelsea)
White Hart Lane (Tottenham)
Old Trafford (Manchester Unt)
City Of Manchester Stadium (Manchester City)
Riverside Stadium (Middlesborough)
Wembley (Wembley!)
And possibly Reebok? (somebody i forgot!)
your opinions