wolfwill23
War Child
Why was there no attack before the election? You know Al Queda would have if they could have, right? What does that say about Bush's handling of the war on terror?
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Do you really know how silly that logic is?
Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don't know we don't know.
wolfwill23 said:Don't you think Bin Laden would have loved to strike before the election (ala Spain)? These people will take every opportunity then can to kill us. You think Bin Laden is holding off because he's a nice guy? Puuuuulease.
So I think it is valid to question why there has been no attack on US soil since Bush started his 'War on Terror.' Is there a chance, just a small chance, that Bush is winning the war? Do you think there is a chance that the Patriot Act is actually working?
Headache in a Suitcase said:i'm saddened that just 3 years after 9/11, this is how we react. a video from UBL is the exact sort of thing that should raise the terror threat level... that should que the mobilization of our nation's police forces, fbi, cia, etc. etc. but that couldn't be done because if it was done, the bush administration would have been accused of trying to influence the election. so so sad.
sharky said:
they also would have had to conceed that the level would have to be raised because of their incompetence to find bin Laden. It's been three years!
wolfwill23 said:Is there a chance, just a small chance, that Bush is winning the war?
joyfulgirl said:If they had wanted to find Bin Laden, they would have.