jick
Refugee
Don't get me wrong ...I like Vertigo a lot. I think it's a perfect lead off single and it is catchy enough to please everyone.
But I noticed a few things about Vertigo.
1. No drum loops, synths, or other effects --- This is just the band in their raw state with guitar, vocals and drums. No synths to cover up their mistakes or make the band sound full when playing live.
2. The tempo is very very fast for U2 --- Can Larry drum this song without losing his timing, night in night out? Doesn't he have back problems? I'd say drumming this song would be similar to Bono singing Red Hill Town every show.
3. The verses are kinda "spoken word" style and not exactly singing --- Will this be undestandable and work in a full band live setting? Aren't this tongue twisty enough for Bono to mix up and forget lyrics (which he always has a knack for) if the song is going too fast and his voice is drowned out by the guitars?
A few years back, U2 released a catchy radio-friendly song with a much more acessible tempo than Vertigo. This song was Staring At The Sun. U2 tried a few times to play it full band to no avail. They eventually ended up doing it acoustically on the b-stage. And it was quite successful. This acoustic version was even included in the Popheart Ep and the Live in Mexico vid due to its success.
I think their live problems with SATS was the tempo - Larry never got a grasp on it. Does anyone forsee the same for Vertigo?
There is a strong possibility Vertigo will not work in a live setting with the full band version, so it will probably be a B-stage staple. Vertigo could be the next SATS and end up being a b-stage classic. What do you guys think?
Cheers,
J
PS: I won't mind it being a b-stage staple, we got the album version to appreciate it full band anyway.
But I noticed a few things about Vertigo.
1. No drum loops, synths, or other effects --- This is just the band in their raw state with guitar, vocals and drums. No synths to cover up their mistakes or make the band sound full when playing live.
2. The tempo is very very fast for U2 --- Can Larry drum this song without losing his timing, night in night out? Doesn't he have back problems? I'd say drumming this song would be similar to Bono singing Red Hill Town every show.
3. The verses are kinda "spoken word" style and not exactly singing --- Will this be undestandable and work in a full band live setting? Aren't this tongue twisty enough for Bono to mix up and forget lyrics (which he always has a knack for) if the song is going too fast and his voice is drowned out by the guitars?
A few years back, U2 released a catchy radio-friendly song with a much more acessible tempo than Vertigo. This song was Staring At The Sun. U2 tried a few times to play it full band to no avail. They eventually ended up doing it acoustically on the b-stage. And it was quite successful. This acoustic version was even included in the Popheart Ep and the Live in Mexico vid due to its success.
I think their live problems with SATS was the tempo - Larry never got a grasp on it. Does anyone forsee the same for Vertigo?
There is a strong possibility Vertigo will not work in a live setting with the full band version, so it will probably be a B-stage staple. Vertigo could be the next SATS and end up being a b-stage classic. What do you guys think?
Cheers,
J
PS: I won't mind it being a b-stage staple, we got the album version to appreciate it full band anyway.