europop2005
Refugee
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 2,420
Rosebud said:That would be really funny if it weren't so incredibly offensive. Not by the way it portrayed Bono (THAT was funny), but the way they portrayed debt relief.
I saw this video a few months ago, and was really surprised at this. I love both the Colbert Report and the Daily Show, but this is really a horrible and irresponsible thing to say. A lot of people who watched this had probably never even heard of the debt crisis, and got their impression of it from this show.
I'm too mad even for the madspit smily!
Rosebud said:That would be really funny if it weren't so incredibly offensive.
elevated_u2_fan said:I'm not sure what I find more funny; the skit or the reaction to it...
Rosebud said:That would be really funny if it weren't so incredibly offensive. Not by the way it portrayed Bono (THAT was funny), but the way they portrayed debt relief.
I saw this video a few months ago, and was really surprised at this. I love both the Colbert Report and the Daily Show, but this is really a horrible and irresponsible thing to say. A lot of people who watched this had probably never even heard of the debt crisis, and got their impression of it from this show.
I'm too mad even for the madspit smily!
dr. zooeuss said:what bugs me about this is that most of the people who watch stewart and colbert are intelligent enough to understand real news programs that would provide them with DIRECT and real information about what's occuring in the world, so that they could take personal action to make this world a better place, but they'd rather watch a program that portrays current events as entertainment, and then spend their time ridiculing the people who think they are only six layers of irony in the show, rather than seven, instead of spending that same energy to get involved in a cause to make the world a better place.
GibsonGirl said:
And is it really a big deal if people satirise African debt relief? Political satire has been around for a very long time now. Touchy subjects are not free from scrutiny. It's just the nature of political satire. Try not to take it too personally. I know I don't! As some of you may know, I was born and raised in South Africa. Last year, there was a cheesy/glitzy Christmas advert on TV telling everyone to buy (Red) Razr phones to save Africans. Ah, capitalism at its finest. My roommate turned to me with a very deadpan expression on his face and said "I'll buy you a cellphone for Christmas. You're much too thin." I couldn't stop laughing for nearly five minutes. If Africans can laugh about it, you can too!
dr. zooeuss said:
If I'm wrong about colbert and stewart, and//or about the humor of this skit, please tell me how and why.
Gisbongirl, why is solving these problems futile? Please don't take this as a personal attack, it is not meant as one, but a post stating 1) Don't take this sort of comedy too seriously, and then 2) Solving this problem is ultimately futile, is exactly the sort of association that bothers me.
GibsonGirl said:
Where can we sign up for the Make African Politicians History campaign?
GibsonGirl said:
Admittedly, I haven't seen the skit so I don't know what kind of message Stephen Colbert and John Stewart were trying to transmit there. If I can actually see it, I'll get back to you.
GibsonGirl said:
As for it being futile...here's my take on it. When I was a young child, I first saw the squatter camp just minutes outside of Cape Town's airport. It's the largest squatter camp in Cape Town. Seeing it was absolutely horrible and the image has been with me my entire life. That squatter camp had been there long before I was born. The ANC came into power in 1994, promising a prompt end to South Africa's hardships and inequalities. Many people in South Africa believed in these promises, including my family. It has been almost sixteen years since I first saw that squatter camp. It's still there. What's more, it's even bigger now. 16 years, and not a damn thing has been done about it. The main problem, in my view, is not that first world nations aren't doing enough to eradicate debt (although it is part of it). The larger issue here is the government. Unemployment is high, wages are low, crime is high...do you know what Charles Nqakula, Minister for Safety and Security, suggests South Africans should do if they're concerned about crime in the country? They should "simply leave". Yes, perfect strategy, Mr. Nqakula! If everyone who is opposed to crime leaves, then only the criminals will be left! Problem solved! Jacob Zuma, the favourite to take over from Thabo Mbeki, has been charged with rape, amongst other things. These are the people who are in charge of the country. How can they be expected to handle poverty, even if debt is erased? And believe me, South African politicians are tame in comparison to what some other African nations have to deal with. Zimbabwe was a prosperous nation before Robert Mugabe took over. Now unemployment is sitting at roughly 80%. Zimbabweans fall into deeper poverty and despair while he rides around in his Mercedes Benz. And you know what...some people in Zimbabwe admire him. Despite the fact that his actions violate basic human rights, people admire him.
GibsonGirl said:
Even if first world nations eradicate all of the debt owed by Africa, the problem of corruption still exists. I know that one of the One Campaign's goals is to fight corruption. How? What is the One Campaign going to do to get rid of people like Robert Mugabe? What are they doing to reduce his power? I see lots of emphasis on removing debt, but not enough on getting to the base of the issue. Corruption is completely at the root of Zimbabwe's problem with poverty. I honestly wonder how much of an impact the Millenium Challenge and similar programmes are having.
Anyway, sorry for going off on a tangent. Back to Colbert... This thread is becoming unfunnier by the minute.
Rosebud said:O dear, I've tried to write an apology letter twice now, but both times when I'm finished, Interference has thrown me off and my post is lost. Sighhh.
Okay, let me summarize:
First, I am PROFOUNDLY sorry for creating such a fuss. Really, I am so sorry for making this into an argument. It was truly not my intention at all.
Secondly, I expressed myself positively horribly the first time, and gave off a completely wrong impression. This is all I was trying to say -- that I absolutely LOVE Colbert and Stewart (seriously, I am a total devotee), and I don't think that anyone is above a poke of fun. But I just thought it was wrong, not to criticize the idea of debt cancellation (sure I would've disagreed, but that's simply a difference of opinion), but to explain it in ways that are just basically untrue. If you're going to make fun of something, at least call it out for what it is. That's what I was upset about at the time. It wasn't that they made fun of debt releif, it was just that the things they said about it were untrue and I thought that's both a bit unfair and irresponsible when you're talking about something so important.
But honestly, I know it's just comedy, and believe me -- I think this kind of comedy is hilarious!!! I soooooo didn't mean to imply that I think Colbert and Stewart are evil or anything like that. Again, I really am sorry. It didn't come out right at all and I hope you all can understand.
ray: