FizzingWhizzbees,
When I said "fluff", I was not reffering to the article that Rono linked to.
"That aside, I'm amused at how many times people dismiss articles as "biased" or "fluff" or "speculation" simply because they don't like what they're saying. It seems that rather than debating the issues, it's simpler to diss those who disagree with you. Nice"
Lets see, I was just described as having my "back to the wall" (really?), told that I was acting like I was the president of the USA, and told that I was unresponsive to this so called "evidence".
The Anti-War movement had multiple articles and rally's about how millions of Iraqi's were going to die in the war as a result of US bombing. I knew that was fluff then and the results of the war support that.
Often, some unrelated facts are put together to insinuate or suggest something much greater than what actually may be the case. The next conspiracy is never far off. Nothing sells Newspapers, magazines and other forms of media better than a conspiracy, whether its fluff or not.