Can't tell if you actually think it would make a difference where he was placed on the card, or you still think we wanted him to headline. The stakes (or lack of) and meaningfulness of the fight (or lack thereof) didn't change regardless of placement. I never said "I think Brock Lesnar should headline ufc 200," no one in here did. I said I totally understood why they had briefly put the fight in that slot--to make sure casuals buy it. 212er agreed, mofo just commented on the fact that say what you want about WWE fake nonsense entertainment, there was a time when Lesnar was legit enough to have been a champ. I'm glad they didn't leave it there, even if there hadn't been another real title fight after the lhw fell apart, I would have preferred the interim* one to get bumped up. especially after the fact knowing how the fight went I'm glad we won't be talking about a potential Lesnar vs Derrick Lewis (or someone else with non-existent takedown defense at heavyweight) in 8 or 9 months when he decides he won that won, maybe another fight will be a good idea.
*real featherweight belt because it's stupid as fuck to have the guy supposedly holding your 145 belt go up to 170 to fight a 155er who whooped his ass the first time. but again, that's $$$ talking.
Hunt's asking for half or to be let out of his contract. Cant blame him for wanting to see if Rizin might give him a big ass payday to fight that ghost of Fedor that Maldonado just almost beat.