Dutch Partygirl
War Child
John has been involved in the musical We Will Rock You though... Not as heavily as Brian and Roger, but he has approved of it.
Dutch Partygirl said:John has been involved in the musical We Will Rock You though... Not as heavily as Brian and Roger, but he has approved of it.
BrownEyedBoy said:
Obviously coming from someone who doesn't know what he's talking about.
UnforgettableLemon said:David. Lee. Roth.
BrownEyedBoy said:I'd like to clarify something up though.
By saying that Queen can't go on without Freddie I don't mean that the remaining three members aren't talented. They are massively talented (just read the credits on the CD's; each of them plays a couple of other instruments and Roger and Brian do wicked backing vocals and sometimes even lead vocals) but without the enormous force that was Freddie Mercury it really isn't Queen anymore.
A frontman that phenomenal is irreplaceable.
Aardvark747 said:I enjoyed it a lot really. I wouldnt go and see any of the other ones like Rod Stewarts or Abba's. This was an exception. And it wasnt at all bad.
Dutch Partygirl said:
Brian May did do two tours with the Brian May Band and he played Queen songs during those tours. But have you ever heard him sing lead vocals?? It's awful... I'd rather hear Paul Rodgers sing them then.
I'm not too keen on this either, but I am very interested to see where this will be going...
Nate Dogg said:
I disagree. I think his voice, while not as powerful and without the range of Freddie's, isn't horrible. His voice seems so fragile on songs like "Love Of My Life", that it's hard to not feel the emotion in his voice. He is no match for Freddie on rockers like "Hammer To Fall", but I think he's far from awful....
TheBrazilianFly said:
I also like Brian May's vocals! Specially on I Want It All. Yeah, he's defenitly not Freddie but I think he can handle some songs. I read somewhere that his solo records were pretty good.
U2girl said:I like it how he said "Queen and Dave Rodgers".
I don't think he means it like "Queen again", but it's rather "a new Queen".
Of course Mercury (and Hutchence) were amazing singers and they are hardest to replace in bands, but if the rest of the members agree and if they do find someone who is a really good singer (I haven't heard Rodgers or whoever INXS will pick yet), I say, why not?
Doors go on without Morrison. (I like Astbury's voice)
The Who go on without Moon and Entwistle.
Metallica and Red hot chili peppers both lost members and they still play, to say nothing of Rolling Stones.
It doesn't have to end.
John Densmore is not involved either.U2girl said:AFAIK, Doors now is made of the same members they had in the 60's minus Jim Morrison, now Ian Astbury.
GibsonGirl said:Queen WAS Freddie Mercury. I consider Freddie to be a better singer than Bono, and that's saying something. You just cannot replace one of the best vocalists that ever lived.
boystupidboy said:At least he would'nt realise what a knobhead Brian May looks like with that fuckin' crap hairstyle........get it cut Bri
Sleep Over Jack said:Queen were always a bit of a joke, so this news fits right in with their "career"