That's not what I'm saying. IMHO U2 are at there best when they work with original ideas. I think their less successful moments are when they borrow ideas from the past, for example, some of the moments on, and in, Rattle And Hum. I love the song God Part II, but the title suggests, in a way, that U2 is writing the sequel to one of John Lennon's greatest songs. It's Lennon's statement on he feels about the end of the Beatles. It's pretty bold to attempt to write a Part II.
I feel similiarly about Hanover Quay. It's just my opinion. Hate me if you want. Abbey Road is one of the Beatles most popular albums. The studio is world famous. I would hate it if U2 got stick from the press again for seemigly aligning themselves with rock royalty so they can appear as heirs to the throne. They are heirs to the throne, they don't need to spell it out. Still, it's only a title, and I can see reasons why it would a nice tribute to the studio. All I'm saying is that it might be misconceived by some as U2 overreaching again. I did like the Let It Be-ish Streets video though. That was cool.
I'm just more in favor of some of their unique titles such as Achtung Baby & All That You Can't Leave Behind. When I first heard those, I was like, "Wow, that's different!" Perhaps many people won't make the Abbey Road connection & feel the same way about Hanover Quay.