Michael Moore Post-Diaster Journal #2 (Somewhere in the Land of Enchantment)

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Danospano

Refugee
Joined
Jun 24, 2000
Messages
1,415
Location
Oklahoma
Somewhere in the Land of Enchantment

9/15/01

Dear Friends,

Our second day on the road back to New York City...

I am awakened by the sounds of the "Star Spangled Banner" coming from the lobby of the hotel where we have spent the night in Flagstaff. The memorial service has begun at the National Cathedral in Washington, DC, and it is on the TV in the lobby. I go down to check it out.

A group of older black women are standing there watching it, tears in their eyes. I am reminded by a sign we saw on the way into town on a Hopi Indian store: "America Land of the Free Home of the Brave." You probably can't find two groups more denied the American Dream than these two and yet they grieve like everyone else over the attack in New York.

Passing through the Indian reservations of Arizona and New Mexico you are struck by the abject poverty of these places, and reminded of the 500 years of state-sponsored terrorism against these people, a virtual genocide. How many millions were killed by the American settlers and soldiers? I can't remember now. But the living results are brutally evident in the shacks and trailers along old Route 66.

My wife and I make our way into town and find a Catholic church, San Francisco de Asis, where a service is being held to honor the dead. The church itself is remarkable for its matriarchal images, with a large mural of Mary and her mother and her family above the altar, and then a statue of her in place of the usual crucified Jesus.

We stand, as there is no room to sit. Minutes go by and the service does not begin. The priest comes and takes a seat in the 7th row pew as if he were just another mourner. After a long while, someone gets up from her pew and reads from the bible -- but the reading is not the one about vengeance and bloodshed. Rather, it's about beating our swords into plowshares. Oops, off message!

We leave the church and both of us are filled with an overwhelming despair. We still have not heard from friends in Manhattan or from our friend Barbara who works at the Pentagon. We pass by a store -- "Guns and Groceries," the sign proclaims. On the way out of town, the cell phone rings. It is Barbara and her husband Sam calling from outside the Pentagon. She tells me she is OK and that there is a large airplane wheel sticking out of the side of the building where she works as a clerical. The morning of the crash she was late for work because she was taking Sam to the airport. I start to cry again. She says thanks and "Don't worry I'm OK," and I hear Sam cracking in the background "That's debatable" and they both laugh.

I pull off the road in Winslow, Arizona, and tell Kathleen I want to get a picture of her on a corner. She doesn't know why and, knowing her intense dislike of The Eagles, I tell her it's a song by Jackson Browne (which is technically true; he co-wrote it). She obliges, but when she reads this I'll be in big trouble.

I continue to be amazed at the large number of people -- both on the radio and those we run into -- who are completely opposed to some half-cocked military response to what has happened. No matter what the media tells you or shows you, I am convinced there is a majority of Americans who, though they want justice and want to be protected from further attacks, do not want George W. Bush to start sounding like Dr. Strangelove.

Speaking of Strangelove, this past week began with one of the most powerful pieces on "60 Minutes" in a long time. They laid it all out: How the United States -- and specifically Henry Kissinger -- plotted to overthrow the democratically-elected president of Chile in the early 1970s. The plot succeeded, President Allende was assassinated, and thousands of other Chileans were brutally tortured and murdered. Today, many within the new government of Chile would like to put Kissinger on trial for these acts of terrorism. Do you think the United States will give him up?

Well, that story was forgotten, 48 hours later, as quickly as it had been forgotten 30 years ago.

A few of you have written me to say, Please, Mike, don't talk about this stuff, at least not right now. We need to bury the dead.

I agree. And I apologize to any who have taken offense. No one wants to talk about politics right now -- except our installed leaders in Washington. Trust me, they are talking politics night and day, and those discussions involve sending our kids off to fight some invisible enemy and to indiscriminately bomb Afghans or whoever they think will make us Americans feel good.

I feel I have a responsibility as one of those Americans who doesn't feel good right now to speak out and say what needs to be said: That we, the United States of America, are culpable in committing so many acts of terror and bloodshed that we had better get a clue about the culture of violence in which we have been active participants. I know it's a hard thing to hear right now, but if I and others don't say it, I fear we will soon be in a war that will do NOTHING to protect us from the next terrorist attack.

I have received more emails this week than ever before -- about a thousand every four hours. Ninety percent of them are from people who also refuse to be drawn into some form of senseless bloodletting, and who agree that we need to find the right way to bring those to justice who committed these acts.

I have been touched by many of your comments and am so sorry I cannot respond to them while I am on the road. But I am sharing your feelings with those I meet (and, I have to say again, it is a Godsend to have an invention like the Internet where I can travel across the country like this and be connected to so many thousands of other Americans ?and to so many foreigners who grieve for us and fear for what our leaders may do).

We pass over the Continental Divide and Rush Limbaugh babbles on about whom we must bomb. He signs off, and I am sure he is on his way down to the nearest recruiting station to sign up -- for surely he would not expect your son or daughter to risk their lives for freedom while he just sits back and enjoys his new half-billion dollar contract.

Coming into Albuquerque, Kathleen is leafing through the Frommer's travel guide for a place to spend the night. She finds what seems like a nice spot near the White Sands national park, but then reads this passage: "Occasionally the road to the hotel is closed for nearby missile tests." Yes, welcome to New Mexico, the "Land of Enchantment," just one big testing ground brought to you by the originators of every single weapon of mass destruction known to man. We opt for the downtown Hyatt.

The hotel is like a ghost town. "Every convention cancelled," the lady at the counter tells us. I ask the bellman how many people are actually here tonight.

"9.9 percent occupancy," he tells me. Hmmm. Why not just say 10%?

I guess that would be asking for too much optimism on a night like this...

I will write again when we get to our next stop, Oklahoma City.

Yours,

Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com www.michaelmoore.com

PS. Three days ago, I learned from someone at ABC News that ABC had videotape -- an angle of the second plane crashing into the tower -- that showed an F-16 fighter jet trailing the plane at a distance.

I have not shared this with you as I had not personally witnessed that tape myself and did not want to contribute to all the unsubstantiated rumors. It just came across on the TV that the government admitted they did dispatch fighter jets when they knew the planes were off course.

From this point, I will pass on any censored information to those of you in the mainstream media who are being blocked from reporting.

Is it becoming more clear now that the plane that went down in Pennsylvania was shot down to prevent it from attacking its destination?

The truth is harrowing, unbearable -- but it must be told to us. A free people cannot make an informed decision if they are kept in the dark. Let's hear ALL the truth NOW.
 
Okay, I'm not stupid, but I am considered absentminded on a few occasions. I know how to spell "Disaster" despite what you may think...
smile.gif
 
Again, mindless tripe.

Again he equivocates the United States and the terrorists. Again, he wants our nation protected (Lord knows why, since we're all so evil). Again he attacks the idea of war. Again he suggests nothing as an alternative.

A nice little comment about how blacks and women are still denied the American dream. A nice little swipe at Rush Limbaugh, the conservative talk show host (who has a greater following, thus the higher salary; do I detect a note of jealosy of both?). And a lovely criticism of the weapons of mass destruction that have kept this nation as free as it is.

Conclude it with a conspiracy theory, and that's the Tripe of the Day.

Am I forgetting anything?

Ah, yes, he's going to Oklahoma City tomorrow.

I'm willing to bet RIGHT NOW that he will bring up the Oklahoma City bombing, blame either the elder George Bush or Rush Limbaugh for it, and point to how dangerous and violent conservatives are -- ignoring, of course, that the Unabomber was a liberal environmentalist.

------------------
- Achtung Bubba

September, streets capsizing,
Spilling over, down the drain


"You know, by God, I actually pity those poor bastards we're goin' up against. By God, I do. We're not just gonna shoot the bastards, we're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy...bastards by the bushel."
from the film Patton
 
I will look on his website, It is refresing
to see some other American opinions instead
of Agrasive propaganda. And Budha, why are
you afriad of different opinions and react
so bitter ?
 
Originally posted by Achtung Bubba:
Again, mindless tripe.

Bubba: I read your various views with interest as you definitely have some solid ideas (although I feel you are bit too zealous in your views), but I disagree with your points here. Yes, Moore's first letter was a bit contradictory. I think that's why many people did NOT respond to it right away. However, I feel that this second letter is very accurate. Hence, it's time to discuss it.

Again he equivocates the United States and the terrorists. Again, he wants our nation protected (Lord knows why, since we're all so evil). Again he attacks the idea of war. Again he suggests nothing as an alternative.

There's a HUGE difference in wanting our country protected and rushing off to declare war - especially when one doesn't know who the enemy is. As of today, bin Laden is STILL denying he had anything to do with this attack - and it's very possible he may be telling the truth. Perhaps his followers organized this, without his knowledge, out of their devotion to him. Perhaps Sadam organized this. Perhaps PLO members organized this. Perhaps all of them organized this. Rushing off to attack won't make us feel better. What if we bomb a country or location and, unlike what Clinton did, we actually kill bin Laden this time. What will that solve? Will you feel vindicated? And what if 6 months from now, there's another terrorist attack to retaliate for this bombing? What then? More bombings? When does it end?

Moore is right - we need to be protected, but sometimes that protection comes from within. We need to tighten our own security further. We need to make sure that less people are entering this country illegally. We need FBI and CIA agents who are willing to look into every threat. If just one agent had taken the warnings they received about these plane crashes seriously, we might not be in this situation - but all warnings were dismissed.

And as we are protecting from within, we must carefully determine who did this terrible deed. Was it a country? Was it some rebel faction? Was it bin Laden? Only after we know who can we start attacking. Even more importantly, once we know who, we can determine the TYPE of attack.

Therefore, Moore's point stands. Protect, yes, but let's not be zealous mongrols in the process.

A nice little comment about how blacks and women are still denied the American dream.

Actually, if you read the passage carefully, it was about Blacks and Native Americans, but women also fit the criteria. Can you deny that Blacks, Native Americans and women weren't treated differently in this country? Women weren't allowed to vote until the 20th century! The first women who tried were arrested! Blacks were slaves until the middle of the 19th century. And as recently as the 60's, they were still treated differently, forced to sit in special areas of a bus or use different drinking fountains or different restaurants. Native Americans were subjected to near genocide. Even today we have "equal rights opportunity" laws just so that people of both genders and all races have a chance at a position - a position that was denied them not long ago. Yet, despite these laws, women STILL make less than men. Many Blacks and Native Americans still live in near poverty conditions simply because they do not have the opportunity for advancement, or what was once rightfully theirs was forcefully taken from them.

Moore was just demonstrating that despite the hardships these people faced, they are still patriotic and loyal to this country. I wonder how many white males would say the same if they were suddenly stripped of everything...

A nice little swipe at Rush Limbaugh, the conservative talk show host (who has a greater following, thus the higher salary; do I detect a note of jealosy of both?).

Don't even get me started on Limbaugh. He's almost as bad as Falwell and Robertson. It's very easy for Limbaugh to talk about war as he sits in a nice comfy chair. That CCR song, "Fortunate Son" (which U2 covered) suddenly fits this scenario all too well. If you are some rich person, it's easy to scream "war" while you and your children are safe "serving their country" in a cushy job. But what if it was you, your son, your brother, your best friend, your wife, your daughter, your mother, your father who was drafted/recruited and sent to fight an unknown enemy? Now what if ALL of those people were sent to fight the enemy? And what if only a few survived? You might feel proud saying that they died for their country, but did Rush Limbaugh's family die for their country?

And a lovely criticism of the weapons of mass destruction that have kept this nation as free as it is.

Sorry, but weapons of mass destruction are good only when they are dismantled and placed in the trash. Ask the people of Hiroshima about those weapons. Imagine if these terrorists somehow were able to get a nuclear bomb inside those buildings instead of using planes. The death toll could have been in the millions. If the blast didn't kill them, the radiation would have. No, these weapons serve no point. Did they keep our country free? Perhaps - the threat of nuclear attacks does have that power. But realistically, can they ever be used? Do you ever want them used?

I'm willing to bet RIGHT NOW that he will bring up the Oklahoma City bombing, blame either the elder George Bush or Rush Limbaugh for it, and point to how dangerous and violent conservatives are -- ignoring, of course, that the Unabomber was a liberal environmentalist.

Now you are just speculating - talking trash for no other reason that to attack Moore. As such, you are just as hypocritical, if not worse, than you claim Moore to be. You are attacking just for the sake of attacking.


To reiterate, Moore's first article was contradictory and as such, I will not applaud it, despite the fact that it had some very valid points. However, this second article was scarily accurate and should cause everyone to pause for a moment of reflection. What has the U.S. done? And what will the U.S. do? Can we right our wrongs? Or should we leap into action and make them worse? I often feel that the U.S.'s biggest weakness is that people do not think. Just a moment - a mere moment - of thought could do so much for so many. Don't cut off that person in traffic. Don't pull that trigger. Don't insult that person. But we speak and act before thinking - and that is our biggest liability.
 
Back
Top Bottom