martha
Blue Crack Supplier
Dreadsox said:
Thanks for the lecture. I do believe we have the freedom to post articles that may have something to do with the topic. I am sorry if you seem unable to look at it from another angle. Your lecturing of me is quite tiresome as well. Next time, PM me if you have a critique of my posting and my opinions. Otherwisse, feel free to not read what I post.
I believe the court is wrong. I am for gay marriage. As a matter of fact I just cast a vote in my church to support it at an Episcopal Assembly for this Saturday. So much for FEEBLE.
Peace
One last issue...Martha...you have NO clue how close to home this issue is for me and members of my family. Not everyone who comes to FYM decides to block out all other opinions. In fact, sometimes I learn more about my opinion by looking at it from the other view.
No, I don't have any idea what you and your family have experienced regarding this issue. I wouldn't assume to know that.
I don't block out the opinions of others, and I try to listen to what others say. My point was that you post many articles that are against gay marriage, more than other FYM regulars that really are against it. When you post them, you offer very little context for your own thoughts on these articles. Now that you've clarified your wariness of court rulings, I understand that a little more.
No, I can't look at this issue "from another angle." It's about discrimination, pure and simple. People can attempt to cloak their discrimination with religion, with fear of "activist judges," with anything else they can think of. They can deny that equal access is a civil rights issue all they want. It isn't. It's about equal access and equal protection, and to even entertain the idea that it isn't, is explicit support for discrimination.