Let's start our own Interference poll. Of course it will be unscientific, and it might be a little early, but oh well. It is anonymous so if you don't want anyone to know who you are for, click the vote in the poll but you don't have to post it.
Seabird said:I chose not voting. I'm not happy with Bush, but I don't see Kerry as any better and may be even worse in some ways. I am not going to vote for him just to get rid of Bush. I haven't heard him say he'd stop the war, and I disagree with him on several issues. I will not vote for Kerry. If the Dems had put up Clark or Edwards it would have made a difference. But even Kerry's face makes me sick, and I don't trust him.
STING2 said:Good to see that there are still 5 people at FYM that still support Bush!
STING2 said:Good to see that there are still 5 people at FYM that still support Bush!
Sherry Darling said:My Dad, right winger though he is, gave me some really good advice- vote the party, not the person. Which party generally agrees more with your values aned beliefs?
FW's right, come on Bushies, show yerselfs.
LivLuvAndBootlegMusic said:Besides, it's not like he didn't win the last election.
DaveC said:
Keep in mind that more people voted AGAINST him than voted FOR him.
DaveC said:
That phrase would be better said:
"Besides, it's not like he won the last election."
Keep in mind that more people voted AGAINST him than voted FOR him.
BluberryPoptart said:
Same was true of Clinton in '92
verte76 said:To answer U2Kitten's question: I'd rather someone voted and didn't vote for my candidate than didn't vote. That being said I understand about not liking either major party candidate worth a damn. Been there, done that. Third party candidacies are not well understood in the U.S, but one function they serve is the "protest vote". If you don't like Kerry or Bush and would rather not vote for either one, a vote for Nader can just mean that you're disgusted with the status quo, and you're saying so. This is heresy for a liberal, but I don't think that a vote for Nader is necessarily a vote for Bush. It's potentially a protest against the domination of U.S. politics by two parties which are rather conservative by universal standards. And yes, I'd rather someone voted for Bush than didn't vote at all.