Mrs. Garrison
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
- Songs 9 and 10: really don't do much for me.
I think you are missing out on the best stretch of songs on the the whole album (songs 8 thru 11)
- Songs 9 and 10: really don't do much for me.
This
I think you are missing out on the best stretch of songs on the the whole album (songs 8 thru 11)
So good.
I think you are missing out on the best stretch of songs on the the whole album (songs 8 thru 11)
But I agree with Digitize. Not a lot of magic here, nothing gives me the heart-in-throat feeling that the best U2 music does. It's competent. In some ways more competent than NLOTH. But there are 4-5 songs on NLOTH I love, whereas I think the count stands at 0 for SOI. It makes me really sad.
I think you are missing out on the best stretch of songs on the the whole album (songs 8 thru 11)
I have to agree that that sounded like a cheap shot. What I meant, though, was that I could well imagine the boys finishing it up, giving it a listen, and realizing it wasn't going to sell as well as a new U2 album should. By giving it away, they could avoid any comparisons on that score.And don't use the "No wonder they gave it away for free" line, it's very lazy and it really weakens any point you are trying to make. By that logic, every album ever released that cost money was good and that is just ridiculous.
Not even Sleep Like A Baby, Troubles, Iris, Raised By Wolves, Crystal Ballroom?I browsed back a few pages, didn't see one. I am wondering if I somehow got a joke copy of SOI, because I don't hear one original or even interesting tune on SOI. What gives? This will be the first U2 album I will not have in my collection in over 30 years of being a fan. No wonder they gave it away for free. Damn.
Every Breaking Wave is a directionless muddle on the 360 tour.
Sent from down the rabbit hole
I have to agree that that sounded like a cheap shot. What I meant, though, was that I could well imagine the boys finishing it up, giving it a listen, and realizing it wasn't going to sell as well as a new U2 album should. By giving it away, they could avoid any comparisons on that score.
I was also just saying that I'm glad I didn't have to pay for it to listen to it. I have no problem with the PR move of giving it away the way they did. I thought it was a good idea. I still do.
I'm never mean for the sake of spite. I'm just terribly disappointed. The mixing is horrible - the tracks sound muddied as hell. It's quite possible the lyrics are good - I will have to go look them up because I couldn't hear half of them. (This is coming from a person who deciphered faint words and Bongolese on many other U2 songs.) Bono's voice is just overwhelmed by the layering.
I totally agree with with digitize - Every Breaking Wave sounds way way better in the bootleg versions from the 360 tour. I can't really comment on the other tracks because I had a hard time telling them apart.
This album reminds me of HTDAAB in a lot of ways, it's just not as good. NLOTH was fantastic - real U2 comfort food with diverse tracks that each had their own sound. I'm guessing the boys got stung by the disappointing sales and backtracked musically. The problem lies, I suppose, in that even though they still have rock 'n roll instruments, they don't have that vibe anymore. They're a pop band now.
Every Breaking Wave is a directionless muddle on the 360 tour.
Sent from down the rabbit hole
TIWYWRMW (that's the acronym, right?)
"Reach Around" is the correct Interference shorthand.
I can see how some previous fans might hate this album. I have a like/dislike relationship with it myself, no really strong emotions either way. I want to love it, but I simply don't. Sometimes I think it borders on "cheese rock". Like dad rock, but with cheesy undertones. Then other times I can chill and enjoy it for what it is. But the cheese is always lurking nearby.
And for god's sake Bono, turn yourself down man!! I'd like to be able to crank the drums and guitar up a bit without having your vocals burn holes in my ear drums! He really needs to go back about 20 years and listen to how his vocals used to be mixed on their albums. More in line with the instruments. I mean bloody hell, I know Bono likes the sound of his own voice, but let the music breathe a bit man!! It started with Pop and just continues to get louder in the mix.... driving me mad...
And Edge, get back in the driver's seat where you belong!! The best U2 songs have Edge in command. What is up with these studio bells and whistles that are louder than the guitar at times on the album? Get rid of that shit!!
I guess what I hate about the production will be mostly alleviated when they play them live (and as evidenced by the promo tour stuff).
Just another album where the live versions will crush the studio versions. I guess that has been the norm since about the mid 90's. They have always been better live, but the gap is widening imo. Mostly due to production issues.
I do think "Iris" is a bloody gem though. But my bet is we won't be hearing that one live. sigh.
Usually songs take turns at the top as I tire of one and find another.
I don't understand how anyone can find this album cheesy or lacking of anything original yet not find these things on their previous 3 albums. This album I still find to be their best since Zooropa, possibly tied with Pop...
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
I don't understand how anyone can find this album cheesy or lacking of anything original yet not find these things on their previous 3 albums.
Well, sure. There's cheese on many U2 albums. It's the lack of instant classics that I think are turning naysayers off. The Troubles and maybe EBW could qualify. Many people described NLOTH as grey (like its cover), but that's how I hear SOI, personally. Just a lot of OK stuff that sounds like U2 without sounding much like a rock band.
What confuses me are the people who claim to hear anything bold or innovative here. Has it gotten that bad? Sleep Like a Baby is kind of different, I guess. The simple fact that it isn't big, dumb and overstuffed is interesting to me.