They're not from Sinn Fein, they're from San Francisco.
Listening to the album again, feel like compared to No Line it has much lower highs but the lows are a lot better. Nothing I find too cringe worthy (except that awful California intro), Song for Someone also sounds like they're trying a tad bit too much
Yeah this is close to how I'm feeling. I don't have clear highs emerging except for the awesomeness of Cedarwood Road - but apart from California there aren't moments making me cringe. Song for Someone is definitely generic though. God I hope it isn't a single. I can just see U2 thinking it would have wide appeal, when in fact it'll sink, garnering just a modicum of play on bad radio stations for fifty-something dads in boring jobs who like to go on about how music just "isn't the same" as it was when they were twenty-something and didn't have kids.
Mainly for Axver, here is my followup to possibly the greatest thread in EYKIW history:
http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f196/is-this-the-worst-u2-album-ever-217118-13.html#post7840879
Oh, and I especially loved the scumbag's support for Milošević, calling him a warrior against the "Vatican conspiracy". Good stuff.
On a slightly more cheery topic thank Christ it's the weekend, auditing training has been the slowest week of my life
Suddenly my week seems really exciting by comparison.
And I was surprised to see every song's lyrics credited to both Bono and Edge. I thought Bono usually had a sole credit for lyrics, with Edge only infrequently getting a (co-)credit?
Well, I listened to So Cruel again on the weekend, and it's not as bad as I remembered it to be. In fact, I kinda enjoyed the end ...