PhilsFan
Blue Crack Addict
I can't wait until your generation is gone.Because SJW's are hypocrites and cancer to society.
I can't wait until your generation is gone.Because SJW's are hypocrites and cancer to society.
I can't wait until your generation is gone.
I'm not Libertarian. But they're better than the rest right now.
You can't be effective at parodying something unless you actually understand it, which you don't. (Which is, as an aside, why right wing comedy never works, because they don't actually understand the issues they're talking about.)Is that a death threat? Why do discriminate against an entire generation. You are a generationphobe. This has triggered my safe space.
You can't be effective at parodying something unless you actually understand it, which you don't. (Which is, as an aside, why right wing comedy never works, because they don't actually understand the issues they're talking about.)
Is that a death threat? Why do discriminate against an entire generation. You are a generationphobe. This has triggered my safe space.
I'm not Libertarian. But they're better than the rest right now.
Didn't you at some point describe yourself as a libertarian with conservative social views?
To which I know I scoffed.
Anyways. Libertarianism isn't terrible. But those who call themselves libertarians in this country generally are unfavorable politicians in my books. And generally don't support the classical liberalism that I like.
Libertarianism is theoretically okay, but kinda terrible in practice. even some widely accepted theories like Nash's equilibrium doesn't occur in real life as people can't behave like game players in game theories.
A libertarian with socially conservative views is as much a libertarian as Bernie Sanders, who is after all no more than a libertarian with economically liberal views.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
A libertarian with socially conservative views is as much a libertarian as Bernie Sanders, who is after all no more than a libertarian with economically liberal views.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Which would be why I scoffed. The very essence of being a libertarian is containing both elements of being liberal in the hands off fashion. Don't control what an individual is allowed to do.
Though, I would argue that a libertarian is more likely to be "economically left" than "socially conservative." I know we've had this very discussion before. I see libertarianism as accepting of some forms of institution. Example: infrastructure. Social policies aren't up for debate, though... because the purpose of being a freaking libertarian is to move power to the people. It's about individualism. Being part-libertarian isn't really a thing.
Didn't you at some point describe yourself as a libertarian with conservative social views?
To which I know I scoffed.
Anyways. Libertarianism isn't terrible. But those who call themselves libertarians in this country generally are unfavorable politicians in my books. And generally don't support the classical liberalism that I like.
Are you aiming for the blaze of glory approach to ending your forum stay? Keep up this ridiculous tirade and I'll happily oblige.
I'm not an individualist, which is why I'm not a Libertarian. I'm more of a statist. Leave social issues to the states. Not mentioned in the constitution, defer it to the 10th Amendment.
Let's not beat around the bush here. Although libertarians tend to support positive social legislation, as a political ideology it is farcical, peddling an economic standpoint that can best be described as reckless and dangerous. It is impossible to take seriously.
If you call that to "offer a view contrary" than I seriously pity anyone who has to deal with you on a somewhat regular basis.Haha. You offer a view contrary to the MODS,
Rant over.
Throw your typical condescending and SJW responses at me, I couldn't care less.