DaveC
Blue Crack Addict
you're as diluted as Sanders and Trump
diluted
you're as diluted as Sanders and Trump
diluted
NONE of this speaks to how she's an embarrassment though. "Establishment" does not necessarily = "embarrassment".
What plan does dickhead Donald have to increase your salary? How does a man who's been handed everything in his life, and when he did fail walk away from his responsibilities by filing bankruptcy, qualify as someone who is a champion for the middle class? Can you see how that makes absolutely no sense to anyone outside of the world of Breitbart.
This.
He got 1 million $ to start up his real estate businesses from his dad. Some champion!
If I talk about misogyny, will people respond the same way they do when someone brings up race and Obama? (STOP SAYING I'M RACIST IF I DISAGREE WITH OBAMA)
Because it's an issue (not the only issue, but it is present) here.
Gender is more complex than even race, and there may be something about the power of the presidency -- it's not like being PM, there are real differences -- that makes men (and many women) upset when envisioning a woman in that position.
I know, I know. HRC has been around for 25 years. She's as establishment as they come. She's "unlikeable." She's shrill. Earlier we talked about how much of a bitch she was or wasn't. Remember that?
Is the presidency so inherently alpha that any female candidate would be "unlikeable"?
Small loan; he knows the plight of the working class.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
I t
Hillary is uniquely unlikeable in my opinion. She has a tendency to come across as really, really smug, which is interesting because I see Obama as more professorial and intellectual which a certain segment of society hates, but he (mostly) manages to not come across like he is irritated to be explaining something to the masses yet again. She also comes across as a liar in the sense that she would be willing to do or say whatever it takes - plenty of examples of male politicians who also change their votes whichever way the wind blows. Hell Trump is a much bigger liar and has been branded so.
None of this in any way justifies voting for Trump, but I think that we're really trying to twist ourselves into a pretzel here to explain away Hillary's faults as somehow being the inherent fault of a sexist electorate. Sorry, there is plenty there to dislike without any misogyny. I have many, many highly educated feminist (some even ultra-feminist) friends, not a single one of them thinks much of her, though would all vote for her given the alternative.
most likely a 4 year stagnation or set back, and then 8+ years of a progressive agenda moving the country ahead
Just like Hillary. I can't even tell the difference between the parties anymore.
In fairness to Nader voters, it's not as if 9/11 and what followed in terms of the Bush presidency was foreseeable. Yes, you could have thought at the time that he'd be a worse president than Gore because of certain of his policies and the way he used the religious right at the polls, but nobody could have predicted the depth of his administration's incomp.
Really?
what
that's not all true r in the sense that certain people in Clinton's Administration were trying to get the incoming W adnin to watch out for Bin Laden. To which they paid little heed
Then there was the memo in ? August 6 2001 saying that "Bin Laden determined to strike in US" Sex Rice said itvwas past tense not present possible , which I think us bukkshit
Sex Rice .
If elected president, he promised to lift restrictions on natural gas production using fracking, offshore oil drilling, and oil and gas production on federal lands. He would immediately cut off all U.S. funding for United Nations climate programs and cancel U.S. agreements under the Paris accord. Trump claimed his plan would eliminate America’s reliance on foreign sources of energy, restore the coal industry to its former glory, and avoid the loss of “millions of jobs and trillions of dollars” of wealth that would be destroyed under the climate change policies of his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.
The real San Fransisco treat
The only rice that burns calories...
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
This is totally irrelevant to what I posted.
The PUBLIC who went to vote is not privy to national security briefings, memos, etc and it isn't as if it was common knowledge that Bush would, in the future, ignore past warnings. How on earth was any person voting in November 1999 supposed to foresee that?
as for the other presumed nominee, how can anyone say this person is not a lying worthless excuse for a candidate
Clinton: I Was Worried That Individuals Who Used Their State.gov Address Weren't Receiving My Emails | Video | RealClearPolitics