And I can't can't wait until THE first female president of the United States of America tells them to GFY.Well, people still wonder what's on the missing Nixon tapes...not impossible that missing Clinton e-mails had things that would be potentially damaging to her.
I do think this issue is far from over. I can't wait until the ninth select committee really gets to the bottom of it all.
30000 emails ..113 ooops..that's a .0037 average. Let's see what R on The United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence have done with their emails...maybe they are batting Mendoza.
...
And I can't can't wait until THE first female president of the United States of America tells them to GFY
Really there are people who wonder about the Nixon tapes at this time? We heard Billy Graham ...we heard Nixon ...what more do we need to hear?Well, people still wonder what's on the missing Nixon tapes...not impossible that missing Clinton e-mails had things that would be potentially damaging to her.
I do think this issue is far from over. I can't wait until the ninth select committee really gets to the bottom of it all.
And I can't can't wait until THE first female president of the United States of America tells them to GFY.
Your logic being that all classified material is a matter of life and death? Too much is classified...haven't you argued the government is too secretive? Or do you wish it to be more so? Logic?Couldn't have asked for better posts to underscore my point.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Hopefully that was snark about vagina.And I can't wait until THE first female president sells us out on social security with a "grand bargain" with the GOP, authorizes fracking around the country and backtracks on her TPP position.
Will the vagina even matter by that point?
Should it even matter now? Of course not. Only if you care more about superficial qualities than actual politics.
Donald J Trump needs underscores.Couldn't have asked for better posts to underscore my point.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Well, people still wonder what's on the missing Nixon tapes...not impossible that missing Clinton e-mails had things that would be potentially damaging to her.
I do think this issue is far from over. I can't wait until the ninth select committee really gets to the bottom of it all.
A private email server, a gmail account, and an email account on a government server are not all equivalent in terms of security. The distinctions matter, and it's utterly exhausting listening to the mental gymnastics Clinton supporters will go through in order to avoid whatever cognitive dissonance would result from admitting that they support a candidate who, as far as we can rationally assume, behaved astronomically stupidly, at best. The obscurantism on this issue is embarrassing. This isn't really aimed at you, BVS, but at people diminishing this issue in general
No, gmail accounts, government servers, and private servers are not equal in terms of security. Neither are the distinctions minor. If an understanding of the wide range of network security measures that are used won't prove this point, James Coney's specific reference to the fact that her server was less secure than gmail should.
No, private email servers are not particularly common among private citizens. An an email account like me@mywebsite.com is not necessarily the same thing as a private email server.
But you do apparently hope that she suffers from some sort of debilitating health issue... soooo yea.You support murder and I don't.
She wanted to have control over the process and have privacy that the transparency of a government e-mail address wouldn't allow...that much is obvious. Would she have been so intent on doing it if she weren't planning to run for President? Perhaps not.
I guess I can still hope her health issues act up before the convention.
"How DARE you, BigMac!"
Yawn. If you support drone strikes, you support the active killing of human beings. Wishing someone would just get sick for the benefit of the American people is hardly on the same level as actively murdering other people, regardless of their crimes. Clinton and her followers are the sick ones.
There's stll time. There's still time.
I think delusional is the word you were looking for.If you think that if Sanders were elected that he would stop drone strikes, you are mistaken.
If you think that if Sanders were elected that he would stop drone strikes, you are mistaken.
The whole thing stinks from the fraudulent start. And the bulk of Americans are too stupid to sort it out.
I admit I don't have a solution on foreign policy, but this is the attitude I see from the leftists who are given great pause on Obama's foreign policy plan. It goes back to the concept of "What inspires those in the Middle East to hate the west?" and the belief that every time we retaliate against them for something, we're creating more motivation, more recruiting techniques for the ISIS's of the world. So, yes, we may suffer some terrorist attacks and may look weak for not responding to them, but my understanding is that they believe long-term, sitting on our hands for a few rounds will reduce the frequency and motivation for these attacks. That their main goal is provoking a response from the US, and when no response comes, that's when we start gaining ground.Complete disengagement (and then when 9/11 type attacks happen we just suck it up)?
It's fascinating how you and the Trump delcon fascists are parroting the same lines, right down to the casual sexism.
This probably warrants its own thread, but those of you who are 100% opposed to drone strikes, what do you propose in the alternative? Complete disengagement (and then when 9/11 type attacks happen we just suck it up)? Troops on the ground (whose)?
I admit I don't have a solution on foreign policy, but this is the attitude I see from the leftists who are given great pause on Obama's foreign policy plan. It goes back to the concept of "What inspires those in the Middle East to hate the west?" and the belief that every time we retaliate against them for something, we're creating more motivation, more recruiting techniques for the ISIS's of the world. So, yes, we may suffer some terrorist attacks and may look weak for not responding to them, but my understanding is that they believe long-term, sitting on our hands for a few rounds will reduce the frequency and motivation for these attacks. That their main goal is provoking a response from the US, and when no response comes, that's when we start gaining ground.
I don't really buy any of that. I don't yet buy that we need to settle for drone strikes either. But I don't have any solution as of yet.
I think one other thing that is patently obvious is that the Clintons are their own worst enemy. You would think that a person who clearly had designs on the presidency, who was serving in the SoS role that was inevitably going to be highly scrutinized by the opposition would understand the concept of doing everything above board and then some. But no. This was a witch hunt for sure but it's also contributory negligence on Hillary's part.
I think one other thing that is patently obvious is that the Clintons are their own worst enemy. You would think that a person who clearly had designs on the presidency, who was serving in the SoS role that was inevitably going to be highly scrutinized by the opposition would understand the concept of doing everything above board and then some. But no. This was a witch hunt for sure but it's also contributory negligence on Hillary's part.
I'd be interested to hear this discussion play out, but given my own perspectives/views (in the greater scheme of things) I don't think there is any need for me to take part.
But you do apparently hope that she suffers from some sort of debilitating health issue... soooo yea.
I agree. I can't defend the stupidity or dismissiveness of what she did. But I do think part of it was because she was under such scrutiny. And it completely backfired. Imagine being under constant attack from the GOP, I think she wanted to have control over her own correspondence.
It's so simplistic to just treat ISIS et al. like they are toddlers, i.e. ignore them and they'll go away.