gvox
Ghost of Love
Love is Blindness
Not really. The word musically generally means musician wise. Or however you want to call it. It's not about how it's processed, or how it SOUNDS. It's about how it's created, what it exists of. The notes, chords, the complexity of it all.
It has NOTHING to do with personal perception.QUOTE]
that's precisely what I meant Thanks Galeongirl for this clarification
I thought that there were more musicians that posted here until I saw this thread.
Not really. The word musically generally means musician wise. Or however you want to call it. It's not about how it's processed, or how it SOUNDS. It's about how it's created, what it exists of. The notes, chords, the complexity of it all.
It has NOTHING to do with personal perception.
that's precisely what I meant Thanks Galeongirl for this clarification
There are people ( like me for example ) who is not into music, chords, tunes, high C´s and so on ...I just enjoy the beauty and the quality of U2 songs... I´ve mentioned Bad but I know this song is not perfect musically... maybe just to be a little "controversial" ... (just would like to mention Paulrg post when he said: "Bad is so musically simplistic but devastatingly effective"..)
I Still Haven´t Found What I´m Looking For(album version) gets my vote. Again, Larry´s drumming is awesome, awkward and so totally different to the simplicity of the classical chord pattern in the song - it almost sounds like it´s the drumming from another song pasted into this one. And Adam´s bass of course has a special groove here, but what interests me is the end of the song, where the chord pattern should make him change the D to a G (or whatever the key they play it in), but he keeps on without changing, which creates a tension between the bass and the guitars. Exciting! And the guitars, the guitars... From the strange drum/guitar intro (have you ever heard a song start like that?) to the layers and layers of suonds, or should we say colours?
The song is so simple you can play it at a camp fire - and yet the album version is so complex not even U2 has managed to make it an interesting song live.
Now, that is what I call interesting!
BTW, some of you should try not to kill the thread by insulting other U2-fans. It´s only rock´n roll...
Maybe you just shouldn't reply to the bloody thread if you aren't actually capable of responding to the topic of discussion. If you can't say what songs would be interesting to a musician in terms of song structure and composition, it's time to move on to another thread, one where you can prattle to your heart's content about what songs you think sound most interesting to the untrained listener rather than to a musician or a musically-knowledgeable listener.
Also, your fake signatures are ridiculous. Just so you know.
As for the actual topic of discussion, Zooropa is definitely a strong contender for most musically interesting in my opinion.
Best suggestion, so far!
BTW, some of you should try not to kill the thread by insulting other U2-fans. It´s only rock´n roll...
The Song "Good Vibrations" by The Beach Boys...I HATE HATE HATE that song
Am I making ANY sense?
Here's an example: The Song "Good Vibrations" by The Beach Boys...I HATE HATE HATE that song,
You are dead to me.
By living near Chicago, I'm forced to be around Bears fans...does that mean I root for the Bears?
how can someone not like good vibrations?! you're not american, ashley. sorry. please move to france asap.
btw, my picks would be zooropa and lemon. aww yeah.
Of course not. WE all now the truth. Which is ....
THE BEARS STILL SUCK!
(Sorry, I just spent a weekend with Packer fan relatives. It's a never-ending refrain.)