I'm not suggesting that Europeans don't like to coexist, nor that the segment's message is unworthy, it's just a bit simplistic. Regarding the comparison between Europe and America, I was really emphasising the difference between the audiences. It's not a vast one, but there are certainly social differences between the two continents. Things that might work politically or have a resonance with European audiences, for example, might not work as well in the US, and vice versa. It's not a criticism of either grouping, just something that I've heard suggested and in which I think there is something to at least merit some discussion.
I think that the crux of this issue is the difference between being beaten over the head with a message that's overly idealistic and simple and being drawn into a world that is full of contradictions, where it's far more difficult to get a grasp on the central important issues. Please is a perfect example of this. Although the message of the song 'Love is hard and love is tough' centrally addresses the idea that the North should move on from its previous differences, the writing recognises the central difficulties in actually achieving this progression. This is what made the Sarajevo segments work so much better than the co-exist segment; on the Sarajevo segments you got the warts-and-all side of the conflict. Particularly important in this respect was the person who asked what good the broadcasts were and what they were actually achieving. It's this kind of nuance that I think was missing from something like the co-exist segment, and at times from Sunday Bloody Sunday and the modern version of Bullet the Blue Sky as a whole (again a song which worked excellently in its original format because of the images that Bono used to portray the central American context).
In other words, what works for some doesn't work for others and I think that for me, and it seems for several other people, the co-exist and human rights segments just didn't work.
Phew!