SOE 25 - The Freakout

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Eh.

I'll say this. There is no doubt in my mind that this will be a stronger album than its predecessor. The band has mentioned feeling let down by SOI's overproduction and wanted this new record to be more muscular and direct and that's clearly the case with both this song and "Little Things" - both of which are more inspired than almost everything from the last cycle.

But it's still just a song that isn't really going to sweep anyone off their feet. It chugs along and the production is kind of cool. Maybe you just really want to hear U2 regardless or you'll listen enough to learn to love it, but this band's days of writing a great song passed almost a decade back with NLOTH and writing a classic with some of HTDAAB's tracks.

I've kind of been contemplating an "exit" from this band. The live performances are getting more tired and are a huge hassle to begin with while their latest records just don't really do anything for me. Going out with seeing them perform Joshua Tree in its entirety about 10 feet in front of me seems like the perfect capper.


So basically anyone who does think the song is great will be wrong?
 
So basically anyone who does think the song is great will be wrong?

No. But that sort of mentality seemed to thrive around here when anybody had a negative opinion of SOI as they'd get bashed like crazy for having a contrary belief. Like whatever you want to like.

But we all know that there's always an enthusiasm boost that every new LP gets...and once the dust settles, they're basically always held in much worse regard around here.
 
No. But that sort of mentality seemed to thrive around here when anybody had a negative opinion of SOI as they'd get bashed like crazy for having a contrary belief. Like whatever you want to like.

But we all know that there's always an enthusiasm boost that every new LP gets...and once the dust settles, they're basically always held in much worse regard around here.

yeah, i hear ya.

but to be fair to u2/their fans, they're hardly alone in this regard.
 
Why is t that when people don't like a song they have to try to explain why it isn't a "great song" and basically come across as other people shouldn't think it's great etc, if you don't like it then fair enough, have never gotten my head round it
 
The drums and bass better survive when the album version clears of the crowd. Most exciting part of the song. Again, edge is very meh. Wtf is up dude?
 



I found the criticism in this review to be surprisingly constructive and yet optimistic in regards to U2's future.

"And yet, they've been working with Ryan Tedder of OneRepublic, eschewing further collaboration with their longtime co-conspirators Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois in order to chase the warmed-over, U2-like sound that so dominates mainstream rock radio. There is greatness yet in this band. Their bond and their legacy will never fully dissipate. But they need to be willing to break their path once again and rise to the desperate occasion they're so keen to call out if they're going to tap it. If they've taught their fans anything, it's that they can still hope for more."
 
why do you let it affect you so much? if you like the song, enjoy it. there are always going to be people who dislike it.



I don't mind people disliking albums or songs, it's when it's put in a way that says "hey you shouldn't really like it"
 
My thoughts after a few listens:

The thing that stands out most is how confident this track is.

Whereas the Miracle wanted to be both a hard rocker and a big pop anthem, this feels like a song that knows what it wants to be, and does it well. It feels far more effortless and ballsy than anything on SoI. For the first time since well, probably Vertigo, they have a song that isn't ashamed to just be plain ol' rock and roll.

I don't really hear a 'hook' that would make it a radio hit (melodically, i think the chorus is actually pretty bland), so I can understand why U2 have gone with The Best Thing for a single (which will likely have a more distinctive/catchy/upbeat melody). But it serves it's purpose - announcing SoE, having some fun, leaving the pop/hook work to other songs so it can be a straight forward rocker - incredibly well.

What is staying with me is the 'feel' of the song. It's quite impressive in that respect. I suspect we're getting 2 songs for a reason: both are specialising in their own fields, with Best Thing being the single, and Blackout just showing off some of U2's new swagger. I think that's a far better method than trying to write a single song that tries to be all things to all people, and fails. I'd much rather have a song that's unashamedly pop, and another that's unashamedly rock! I think we'll enjoy hearing these 2 new songs back to back, and undiluted.
 

He seems to like TLTTGYA a lot better. The criticism is mostly about the lyrics, which I disagree with; I don't buy that they're trying to sell the idea that resistance is "fun". I don't see that in those lyrics at all. Then he also throws it in with the previous first-singles, which I think is lazy. There's some style similarities to stuff like The Miracle and Vertigo, but I'd say most of it (the melodies, the groove etc.) is more reminiscent of something from Pop than anything else. The structure towards the end, feels a lot more "unpolished" and raw than anything from SOI, NLOTH or HTDAAB.

Doesn't mean the review or his opinion is unfair. I just disagree.
 
but to be fair to u2/their fans, they're hardly alone in this regard.

True. And it's always to be expected that the fans are going to be more welcoming of new material then the general public.

I think one part of the puzzle that always gets ignored is that people that give up caring about a band or television show or whatever aren't ever counted in the whole. In other words, there's plenty of U2 fans (or former fans) who don't go on message boards anymore (or ever) or even gave up caring about the band entirely in years past.

So, basically, any forum or general web audience is mostly going to consist of the people that actually like the new product being put out. Kind of like how Interference became its own echo chamber for SOI being "amazing" while everybody else outside of that space was like, "umm...." as evidenced by the worst album reviews of their career.
 
So, basically, any forum or general web audience is mostly going to consist of the people that actually like the new product being put out. Kind of like how Interference became its own echo chamber for SOI being "amazing" while everybody else outside of that space was like, "umm...." as evidenced by the worst album reviews of their career.


SoI isn't really fair though. So many of those reviews focused on the release strategy than the actual album itself. Hating U2 became a meme again.
 
Or because the release strategy meant people were left with a turd on their phone.

I'm sure HTDAAB wouldn't have had the same reaction from people. It had hooks.
 
Or because the release strategy meant people were left with a turd on their phone.

I'm sure HTDAAB wouldn't have had the same reaction from people. It had hooks.
If they released Bomb in 2004 as a free album automatically given to everyone's iTunes account, they would have been celebrated.

If they released Bomb in 2014 as a free album automatically given to everyone's iTunes account, the reaction would have been exactly the same as it was for Songs of Innocence.
 
I found the criticism in this review to be surprisingly constructive and yet optimistic in regards to U2's future.

"And yet, they've been working with Ryan Tedder of OneRepublic, eschewing further collaboration with their longtime co-conspirators Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois in order to chase the warmed-over, U2-like sound that so dominates mainstream rock radio. There is greatness yet in this band. Their bond and their legacy will never fully dissipate. But they need to be willing to break their path once again and rise to the desperate occasion they're so keen to call out if they're going to tap it. If they've taught their fans anything, it's that they can still hope for more."

I'm waiting on a "real" review from an unbiased source likeRolling Stone!! I think they are going to find a way to give U2 the first 6 star album rating ever at some point.:hyper:
 
Eh.

I'll say this. There is no doubt in my mind that this will be a stronger album than its predecessor. The band has mentioned feeling let down by SOI's overproduction and wanted this new record to be more muscular and direct and that's clearly the case with both this song and "Little Things" - both of which are more inspired than almost everything from the last cycle.

But it's still just a song that isn't really going to sweep anyone off their feet. It chugs along and the production is kind of cool. Maybe you just really want to hear U2 regardless or you'll listen enough to learn to love it, but this band's days of writing a great song passed almost a decade back with NLOTH and writing a classic with some of HTDAAB's tracks.

I've kind of been contemplating an "exit" from this band. The live performances are getting more tired and are a huge hassle to begin with while their latest records just don't really do anything for me. Going out with seeing them perform Joshua Tree in its entirety about 10 feet in front of me seems like the perfect capper.



I'm sure they'll miss you.

Larry will definitely not be on board now.
 
I'm really liking it. That little descending chord between verses is cool. Say what you want but that chorus is catchy af. And Larry and Adam showed up!

The only part I'm unsure of is Bono at the end, he seems to go off script a little, but I'm thinking the studio vs is different.
 
Do you guys think the Kygo Remix will be released someday ? Is it still a thing ?
 
I'm really liking it. That little descending chord between verses is cool. Say what you want but that chorus is catchy af. And Larry and Adam showed up!

The only part I'm unsure of is Bono at the end, he seems to go off script a little, but I'm thinking the studio vs is different.

It does sound like they still want to produce a radio hit. But agree that the chorus sounds very catchy, and the rest of the song raw and punkish
 
Its a good song for the most part, I'm just not liking the simplicity of the chorus at all, it doesn't gel with the rest of the song.

Definitely prefer Little Things, and from what I have heard of the Kygo leak of Best Thing, it sounds like they made the right choice for the lead single.
 
Interesting... my girlfriend just forwarded me an email she got from "Live Nation Concerts" with the same body text/picture/links as the U2.com "Blackout" announcement email.

Her email address & Live Nation account are in no way connected to U2 (never bought tickets, music, merch, or been subscribed to their newsletter) so I wonder if they're promoting it to all LN members?
 
I think my favourite thing here is the fill riff between lines in the verses - not common in U2 songs, and songs they have written that are similar to the Blackout don't have anything like it. You can just see them developing this song and not having it, and it being half the song it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom