xaviMF22
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
elevated_u2_fan said:
this one is still my favorite
way different than live version
I would have liked more of Jonny's guitar though
elevated_u2_fan said:
this one is still my favorite
xaviMF22 said:
they took some energy out of it...
LemonMelon said:
Like Jigsaw? Because I don't mind the more acoustic-ish version on IR.
LemonMelon said:MK1 and MK2 are completely pointless.
LemonMelon said:MK1 and MK2 are completely pointless.
thetitans2k said:How is this labeled in torrents? I cant find it
thetitans2k said:ucccch. Im not a member at atease.
djerdap said:
I don't believe that Nigel is the only one to blame for the "neutering".
u2popmofo said:
Agreed. With how long they take to make albums, it's not as if the band wouldn't have told him to change the mix if they didn't like/want it that way.
I'm not sure what the deal with over production is (U2, Radiohead, etc). Too much time in the studio? Too much reworking/processing/compression? Over-thinking it? With Radiohead, I think a lot of the issue is just that people have already heard these live, as a live version of a song is in nearly all cases always going to sound more "raw" and "rocking". I'm really glad I hadn't heard any of the new tracks other than the super old completely different version of Reckoner and the orchestra version of Arpeggi. Ends up being a surprise and not ruining what I was expecting them to be (ok, I still am a bit disappointed the old version of Reckoner was completely scrapped, but the new version is nice too).
Zoomerang96 said:the slow songs are indeed the highlights.
last flowers, go slowly and four minute warning are brilliant.
but wow... bangers and mash is so empty. empty empty empty... that's nigel for you.
bangers and mash NEEDS to be a dirty song. it needs grit and it needs to be ugly. this is just something in between.