Danny Boy
Rock n' Roll Doggie FOB
I don't know whether they were right or wrong, but in 2000 the major record labels in the US felt that singles eroded album sales. That's why they killed singles.
I have no doubt that Beautiful Day could have been a top 10 single. I'm saying that the labels at the time didn't care, they were only interested in selling albums because they have the highest margins. I would assume that they had some marketing research to back up the idea that people wouldn't buy the album if they could just buy the single, and iTunes seems to be proving that.
I don't know about MJ and Elvis, But the Beatles' "1" included songs that went to #1 in either the US or the UK, so a lack of #1's in the US wouldn't prevent U2 from doing something similar. But really, do they need another "best of" album at this point?
I have no doubt that Beautiful Day could have been a top 10 single. I'm saying that the labels at the time didn't care, they were only interested in selling albums because they have the highest margins. I would assume that they had some marketing research to back up the idea that people wouldn't buy the album if they could just buy the single, and iTunes seems to be proving that.
I don't know about MJ and Elvis, But the Beatles' "1" included songs that went to #1 in either the US or the UK, so a lack of #1's in the US wouldn't prevent U2 from doing something similar. But really, do they need another "best of" album at this point?