BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
Like I said, the worse out of humanity.
The rioters are disgusting creatures..never been happier to live in an area largely free of 'the richness of diversity' than right now with these disgraceful events.
Yes you are, but in this country 80% of the crime is black.
Comments like this make me sick.
The rioters are disgusting creatures..never been happier to live in an area largely free of 'the richness of diversity' than right now with these disgraceful events.
Yes you are, but in this country 80% of the crime is black.
The rioters are disgusting creatures..never been happier to live in an area largely free of 'the richness of diversity' than right now with these disgraceful events.
Dickhead.
Moron.
you're being very monosyllabic there Earnie!
I think name calling of other forum members is not attractive.
It brings nothing to the discussion.
If one disagrees with a statement or premise, they should address the points they disagree with by writing a reasonable rebuttal.
Yes you are, but in this country 80% of the crime is black.
Fair enough.
You managed to actually get this perfectly wrong. 80.6% of arrests in the UK are white, 7.6% are black.
http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/statistics-and-data/mojstats/stats-race-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2008-09c1.pdf
Like I said, it's not a race thing. It is mostly a socio-economic thing. But overwhelmingly, it's a fuckwit thing.
Thanks deep.I think name calling of other forum members is not attractive.
It brings nothing to the discussion.
If one disagrees with a statement or premise, they should address the points they disagree with by writing a reasonable rebuttal.
This is a longstanding issue in the US as well; for example, according to the Dept. of Justice black Americans are more than twice as likely as whites to have their cars pulled over and searched, even though searches of white people's cars are more than twice as likely to turn up illegal possessions (usually drugs). Blacks are also more than three times as likely to have force used against them (gun drawn, grabbing etc.) when pulled over. Having said that, studies comparing ordinary citizens' responses to policemens' during video simulations where one 'shoots' at (if armed) or not (if unarmed) young male targets of various races have consistently found that police do lots better than most of us at resisting their unconscious racial biases, so, as much as we might like to think in terms of some corrupting 'police culture' that the rest of us are happily free from, the evidence doesn't actually support that."Figures released in June 2010 showed an increase in the number of black and Asian people stopped, and revealed that black people were seven times and Asian people two times more likely to be stopped by police than white people."
Sounds like things are actually worse in Manchester than in London at the moment? Unsurprising I guess, considering the hugely increased police presence in London.I can tell you that in Manchester it is mainly 'white' youths doing the damage here.
Earlier in the day Greater Manchester police sent 100 officers–-four public order units-–to assist in London. While Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, who organised the reinforcements, said such assistance had been planned to ensure other forces could cope with violence in their own areas, it was clear that the city could have used the extra officers.
It actually all kicked off as a racial thing. So to say its not racial just shows you haven't read fully into the situation. It all kicked off because a police officer shot dead a black man. His family wanted a peaceful protest, but gangs took it to violence and riotting.
Now its just turned into chaos, no one even knowing why their rioting. It's just ludacris.
It all seems the more pointless what is going on up here. There was an interview with one of the 'youths' in question on Sky News and it was just depressing with all this 'it's to show the police what we can do' nonsense.