Right, because activists have nothing to do with it.
Tell me where the "science" is that explains homosexuality to be anything but a behavior.
the act of having sex is a behavior, just as much as the act of having heterosexual sex is a behavior, but same-sex attraction -- which is the heart of being gay, when you are physically and emotionally attracted to the same gender -- is absolutely involuntary.
i find that the complaint that theres no "gay gene" to be proof of anything is rather laughable.
why are people gay? no one knows for sure. there's a world of thought and discussion out there that ranges from biology to psychology, but the overriding thing that EVERYONE agrees with is that it is unchosen and involuntary. people are gay, as simple as that.
When 90% of them have had sexual relationships with the opposite sex, there is choice involved.
erm, setting aside the source of this statistic, is it at all possible that gay people -- growing up in a world that's heterosexist -- might
try to be straight, they might try to have a relationship with an opposite-sex person, and then realize that it doesn't work?
because i've had heterosexual sex. over 10 years ago at this point. i'm as gay as they come. i never once thought about women in my sexual fantasies, but i tried it. and it didn't work.
where's the choice here?
No anti-sodomy laws, no special definitions.
what's a special definition? what's a special right?
really what you're saying is that you don't care. that you have no compassion. that you are allowed to talk about your wife and child but a homosexual should shut up about their partner our perhaps their children.
that's really, really awful.