So, again, it sounds like you just want this kid to stop playing around and act like a man.
And again, you leave me wondering where your previously mentioned empathy comes into play. The more you speak on this topic, the more that 'individual empathy' sounds like lip service.
Since we have now learned that "sex" and "gender" are not synonymous I'd like to know:
1) At what point, if any, does the fact of two biological sexes trump the Golden Corral smorgasbord of personal gender self-identification?
2) At what point, if any, does the need for businesses, private organizations and society at large to maintain rules, standards, consistency and common sense trump the personal demands of a very few being spurred on by the ideological bubble of post-modern, academia gender-theories?
3) Who, if anyone, gets to say "No, you have a male genitalia so the answer is no."
Examples off the top of my head:
1) As a 17 year-old male this kid's auto insurance rate would be extremely high, must insurance company acquiesce and give him the lower female rate?
In other words, do insurance companies get to use sex or gender in applying rates?
2) Will law enforcement and the media be allowed to use sex or will we be told in the near future that the First National Bank was robbed by a 5' 11"
'pangender' approximately 25 years old? So be on the lookout !!
3) Will college sororities and fraternities retain the right to remain biologically female or male?
4) Back to sports but on the professional level. Will the "female at birth" rules of the WNBA, LPGA and professional tennis go away completely?
5) Will prostate examinations become standard training for OB/GYNs?
You get the point. It's
your brave new world so it's incumbent on you to explain to me how it's works.