Which is why I said, if you look closely,
Now, let me make a very important and fundamental point about all of this. To me, it should be a relatively clear and obvious point but, for some - particularly in the West, frankly - it apparently isn't, and I genuinely don't mean that in a sarcastic way.
Seeking to understand why actions such as the first or second World Trade Centre bombings, or for that matter, the Iran hostage crisis, or what happened in London in July 2005, or the Madrid train bombings a year before, is no way supportive of any of those disgusting and disgraceful criminal acts of murder and terrorism.
In fact, it's the complete opposite of that. It's a process of trying to understand why these dreadful events happened in order to try to ensure that they don't happen again.
The difference between the point of view of anti-war people and that of Bush/Cheney, for example, is that we say it's a crime to kill innocent people for the crimes of guilty people whether it happens in London, or New York, or Afghanisation, or Iraq, or Madrid, or Tel Aviv, or anywhere in this world.
We don't just say it's a crime when it happens in New York or London or Madrid. In other words, the blood of some peoples' should not be more valuable that the blood of others. That philosophy that there should be different values on different peoples' blood is immoral, evil, and wrong - as the 911 bombings were immoral, evil, and wrong.
That's the difference. Please, try and grasp this point. I am trying to explain it as best I can. The blood of some people should not be more valuable that the blood of others.
It isn't a conspiracy. It's pretty open, pretty up front and out there, at least for those that have eyes to see. It isn't necessarily Zionist either, for that matter, certainly not specifically so. The 'conspiracy' certainly isn't in the long term interests of Israeli citizens, or of Jewish people in general. Or of you, or of Strongbow, or of me.