MadelynIris
Refugee
Yolland is the smartest man on the face of the planet.
*whisper* Yolland is a woman
OceanGirl said:
Yes, it is definitely ok to ask a partner what they think about while they are at it and no way in hell would it be ok to say "none of your business"... of course it is their business!!!
obviously those fantasies aren't going to be limited to images, thoughts, or scenarios involving each other only.
OceanGirl said:I don't see any problem with ther checking your computer. There shouldn't be any "privacy" issues when you are a couple. As far as I see it, once you are in a stable relationship with someone (especially someone you are going to marry), then NOTHING should be kept private from that person!
As for porn - ick! My husband doesn't look at it because he knows that the thought of him looking at other women naked makes my skin crawl!!! He did have a stash of porn when we met, but it went in the bin as soon as I became aware of it.
I don't consider looking at other women naked and having a flog over them to be particularly respectful or faithful towards your partner. It just isn't something I would be happy to put up with in a relationship.
OceanGirl said:There shouldn't be any "privacy" issues when you are a couple. As far as I see it, once you are in a stable relationship with someone (especially someone you are going to marry), then NOTHING should be kept private from that person!
redhotswami said:
so ya'll pee with the door open?
redhotswami said:
so ya'll pee with the door open?
i totally disagree. a relationship means people are joined together, but that doesn't mean they lose sense of themselves. Since people are quoting others, I'm gonna quote one of my favorite mystic poets...who I think tells it all brilliantly
...but let there be spaces in your togetherness
and let the winds of the heavens dance between
Love one another, but make not a bond of love:
Let it rather be a mving sea between the shores of your souls.
Fill each other's cup but drink not from one cup.
Give one another of your bread but eat not from the same loaf.
Sing and dance together and be joyous, but let each one of you be alone,
Even as the strings of a lute are alone though they quiver with the same music
Give your hearts, but not into each other's keeping.
For only the hand of Life can contain your hearts.
And stand together yet not too near together:
For the pillars of the temple stand apart,
And the oak tree and the cypress grow not in each other's shadow.
Anyway, I think the bigger issue here is mistrust and doubt, which I think is more harmful to a relationship than the porn. Why else would you want to go all up in someone's business unless you were looking for something to prove your doubts?
ShellBeThere said:
Oh, that's lovely poem...I feel like I should know who the poet is (Khalil Gihbran it sounds like?) , but in my ignorance I don't...tell us?!
And I often pee with the door open, but expect my email to not be checked and my fantasies to be my business unless I feel like sharing...
redhotswami said:
It is! It is! You're a fan!
I don't pee with the door open myself (I have a dog...so...kinda weird. Though I watch him pee, I don't let him watch me pee), but yeah I agree with you about stuff being your business. So then do you still feel what you said earlier in that there shouldn't be privacy issues because nothing should be kept private from the other?
ShellBeThere said:
I am a fan...though one who knows too little, mostly quotes from books I borrowed to write my wedding vows lol.
I don't recall if I used any Gibran quotes but I should have!
I actually didn't say earlier that there shouldn't be privacy issues...
I'm a fan of privacy and the idea, as expressed so nicely in that poem, that when you become a 'couple' you don't meld into a single entity...
I'm actually the one who way upthread now revealed that I had serious issues with my spouse reading my emails, and getting upset with things he learned there that he shouldn't have been reading about in the first place because they weren't for him to see, they were buried in long letters I'd written to a friend.
and 'wow' to the stories about problems with porn that Liesje and anitram tell of. Shame and secrecy about it surely add to the whole problematic nature of it in society and in relationships. *Hours* a day?! I sort of agree with MrPryck2U's assessment that if you're looking at porn for more than 10 minutes at a time there's something "wrong" lol...
Cheers!
redhotswami said:
:headslap: i am so sorry!!!! i don't know how i confused you with the poster i was quoting. i thought it was weird that your stance would be COMPLETELY different.
i'm very very sorry! im usually better about that. i must be tired or something. really though, pleaase forgive me. i'm going to bed right after i post this so i don't make any more mistakes like this tonight!
Anyway, The Prophet is one of my fav books of all time! Is that one of the ones you looked at?
as for the stories mentioned above... though, lol sometimes i wish my students had more of the shame and secrecy of watching porn...especially in public computer labs. but then...maybe they watch it there to avoid sneaky significant others who explore the internet history on their computers in their rooms?
so ya'll pee with the door open?
I agree with this--striking a balance with these kinds of things is a "delicate dance" and when it works, part of the reason why is because a mutual understanding already exists as to where the boundaries are. Actively and repeatedly lying to your partner is a problem, snooping around behind their back is a problem too. As you say, it's a little different when there's an agreed-upon moral rejection of porn and I would say if someone holds that particular view, then it's their responsibility to make that clear before they get into an involved intimate relationship with someone. Where it gets fuzzier is where no such categorical objection exists, because--as a quick glance through this thread reveals--there's really no going social protocol about how to draw the boundaries beyond that. Some men (and in some cases women) may prefer to tell their partner upfront and in advance that they'll be looking at porn occasionally, others may figure it's part of their sexual fantasy life and therefore their own private business just like their female partner's fantasies are her own business, and then some, aware of the fact that porn can for some women trigger unwarranted feelings of inadequacy, may opt not to talk about it or look at it when she's around for that reason. I don't think it's reasonable or fair to automatically assume any one of those responses signals a "problem." Actively lying to your partner ("Oh no, I would never look at porn!" when you do) is a problem, needing to look at it for hours daily is a problem. (And for whoever asked--'paraphilia' is a clinical term for reliance on specific objects or situations to enable sexual arousal, such that the person is unable to participate in reciprocal sexual affection without that enabler present.) But it's also possible to dig your own grave with these kinds of things, and not telling your partner in advance if you have a categorical objection to porn, or automatically assuming that of course they'd readily share it with you if they ever looked at it, then freaking out and treating it as if it were a deceitful betrayal of some (nonexistent) agreement when you 'discover' it, could well be an example of that. That's one of the things I was getting at by wondering if it's perhaps a bit too easy to 'pathologize' porn simply because it involves objects and not imagination--again, how would you feel about it if your fantasies were an open book and your male partner could rummage freely through them going "Hey! what's this guy doing in here?" or "Wait a second, none of these bodies look like mine, does this mean I'm not good enough for you?" or "Damn! Check out this action going down over here, you and I've never tried that, how come?" or "Uhhhh...whoa, you've got to be kidding me, you think this kinda thing is sexy?" Of course porn is unrealistic and objectifying--fantasy almost always is. That's not an argument against expressing any doubts or insecurities you have and expecting a respectful conversation about them, just an observation about recognizing when compromise may be reasonable and shaming the other person, not.maycocksean said:In general the concept that there is "no privacy" in marriage is perhaps not the healthiest one, and approaching marriage with that mindset is bound to cause problems eventually, in my opinion. By the same token, if a spouse feels they have to keep a great deal of their lives "private", that also can damage a marriage. It's a delicate dance that works when the couple both respects each other's privacy AND chooses to be open and honest with each other.
U2Man said:sometimes it amazes me how much people can get out of, well, nothing.
9 pages.
maycocksean said:
In general the concept that there is "no privacy" in marriage is perhaps not the healthiest one, and approaching marriage with that mindset is bound to cause problems eventually, in my opinion. By the same token, if a spouse feels they have to keep a great deal of their lives "private", that also can damage a marriage. It's a delicate dance that works when the couple both respects each other's privacy AND chooses to be open and honest with each other. For me, there really isn't anything I "keep" from my wife. I do a keep a journal (have done so since I was eleven) and I expect my wife to respect my privacy by not reading it. As far as I know she's respected my privacy in that way, and I appreciate that. At the same time there is nothing in my journal that I feel I couldn't share with her. For me, it's just a way of maintaining my autonomy and individuality within my marriage--having something that is just for me.
OceanGirl said:
I do actually!
I don't agree that being honest and sharing everything with a spouse makes someone lose sense of themselves at all.
I will never understand the need for privacy within a relationship. When one half of a couple expects privacy so that they can get off on pics or videos of other people, there are going to be trust issues.
redhotswami said:
You can still be honest to your partner without having to disclose every single personal thing about yourself. If relationships don't leave room for some individuality, or personal space/time, then they become too consuming.
MrsSpringsteen said:
9 pages about Bono's sunglasses? Just to give one example..Isn't it ironic, don't ya think?
It's "nothing" to you, doesn't mean others aren't interested in discussing it. Other than drooling about peeing with the door open.
You can still be honest to your partner without having to disclose every single personal thing about yourself. If relationships don't leave room for some individuality, or personal space/time, then they become too consuming.
I agree. I would personally find that sort of relationship suffocating, and unhealthy. And boring. I think the key is to be compatible enough to agree as much as possible on what the boundaries are in the relationship and discuss what each person would like them to be. There's a line between full disclosure and giving up self and deception- and they are two different things.
If you're referring to me, I'm generally a colossal windbag anyway no matter what the issue. Online, anyhow.U2Man said:i was just wondering how people could write so many long posts about this issue.
yolland said:
If you're referring to me, I'm generally a colossal windbag anyway no matter what the issue. Online, anyhow.
yolland said:
If you're referring to me, I'm generally a colossal windbag anyway no matter what the issue. Online, anyhow.