|
Click Here to Login |
Register | Premium Upgrade | Blogs | Gallery | Arcade | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Log in |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#601 | ||
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boom clap
Posts: 4,435
Local Time: 06:23 PM
|
Bush Said To Give Orders Allowing Raids in Pakistan
__________________Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#602 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
Quote:
![]() this homo-communist-librul-elitist-urbanist-northeasterner just looks down his *nose* at the common flyover state folks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#603 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
Quote:
FAR BE IT FROM ME TO SPREAD RUMORS ... but it has been whispered that Biden has prostate cancer. again, I AM NOT ENDORSING THIS OR SAYING THAT IT IS TRUE NOR AM I SAYING ANYTHING AT ALL REALLY. ![]() could be another fascinating wrinkle. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#604 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
Quote:
how do you sleep? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#605 | |
Refugee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 02:23 AM
|
Quote:
So your admitting that Obama was for bombing Pakistan without their approval? Congratulations, perhaps you might have finally found one idea that Obama could say he was for before others decided to jump on board, although at a different time and because of changed conditions. The administration clearly weighed and considered the consequences of such actions, and had previously felt that the negative consequences of that type of action outweighed the benefits. But with the changes in the political situation in Pakistan, the inability or unwillingness of the Pakistani military to bring security to the border areas, and the increased insurgent activity from there, appears to have changed the caculation on this particular issue. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#606 | |
Refugee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,455
Local Time: 09:23 PM
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#607 |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kettering, Ohio
Posts: 10,763
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#608 | ||
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boom clap
Posts: 4,435
Local Time: 06:23 PM
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#609 |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
Palin is still a sham. as those who excuse her inexperience like to remind us, it's still about the top of the ticket.
and when it comes to the top of the ticket, it's clear who the American people prefer. |
![]() |
![]() |
#610 |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sunglasses, USA
Posts: 17,062
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#611 |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#612 |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
That's not snark, it's just plain rudeness.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#613 | |
Refugee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 02:23 AM
|
Quote:
McGovern did that in 1972 and many claim it increased Nixons margin of victory. Nixon won with 61% of the popular vote in 1972 to 38% for McGovern. But given the situation with Hillary, maybe this would be different. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#614 |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#615 |
Refugee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 02:23 AM
|
Thats a bit much to presume at this point considering the top of the Democratic ticket barely won his own party's nomination and although he had a small average lead of 3 points during the summer, that lead was still within the margin of error. Also, still no sign of the Obama Tsunami.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#616 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
Quote:
or could it be that, when it all settles, most people will come to realize that Obama has actual policies to stand by and defend whereas McCain has sold his soul for some flash and sizzle, but what else? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#617 |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 07:23 PM
|
but joe does botox and hairplugs.
that's flash and schnizzle. ![]() <> |
![]() |
![]() |
#618 | ||
Refugee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 02:23 AM
|
Quote:
Quote:
He is not going to raid the US defense budget to pay for pet domestic programs, or restrict free trade. Unlike Obama he actually does have a record of working with people in the other party and of opposing his own party on various issues. I think these things will appeal to many Americans, but given that in modern times, the country rarely stays with one party for more than two terms, Obama already has a leg up, not because of anything he has actually proposed, but just because he is not apart of the party in the White House at the moment. So yes, things could very well fizzle and Obama could walk across the finish line with New Mexico, Colorado and Iowa in his pocket, just enough to become President. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#619 | |||||
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:23 PM
|
Quote:
hey, kiddo, we all speculate. if you're so desperate to feel good about yourself that you're going to bring up speculation that, even at the time itself was labeled by me as speculation, go right ahead. it simply make syou look more pathetic. McCain is a 3rd Bush term, and, yes, Bush is the worst president at least in my lifetime. why do you think he literally phoned in his address to the RNC? why do you think McCain didn't mention him in his acceptance speech? why do you think McCain won't mention him when he's stumping? why do you think McCain has tried to steal not just Iraq policy from Obama but the overall platform of "change" from him as well? it is the Democrats year. they are set to win big time in congress. McCain spent his RNC repudiating everything Bush stood for. had it been any nominee other than McCain, the man the Bush people savaged in 2000, it wouldn't even be a contest. Bush is poison. his policies are the worst we've ever had in my lifetime. i know you know this. Quote:
stop pretending like any serious person thinks any different. Quote:
Quote:
i take this to mean that you, like me, think that Palin is a flash in the pan and that when things settle down and she's revealed to be the fraud that she is, and when you really look at the electoral math, you realize that this is Obama's election to lose. which he could. i know you people are betting the farm on racism. as you always do. ![]() Quote:
and race could be too much of a barrier and we could all be dumbed down by 24/7 cable news to the extend where garbage McCain outrages actually stick. but i think you know as well as i do that on the issues Obama is far better for the country than McCain. and if you had any sort of integrity, you'd denounce the current McCain campaign. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
#620 | |||||||
Refugee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 02:23 AM
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The United States continues to have 15 combat brigades on the ground in Iraq and while there have been amazing accomplishments over the past several years, there is still much that needs to be done and it would be risky to withdraw troops pre-maturely. McCain will only withdraw troops from Iraq as conditions on the ground there warrent their withdrawal. Obama continues to flip flop between getting out completely on a set timetable and advocating the Bush/McCain policy of only withdrawing when conditions warrent it. When Obama met privately with General Patreus(for the first time I might add), Obama admitted the General did not agree with his ideas for Iraq over the next 12 months. The majority of the military and national security experts continue to support the removal of Saddam and not withdrawing from Iraq until the Iraqi's can handle the situation on their own. Colin Powell, Norman Swartzkopf, Kenneth Pollack, Michael O'Halon, Meghan O'Sullivan all enormously knowledgeable people on the issue of Iraq continue to support Saddam's removal and the proper rebuilding of Iraq. Instead of repeating outdated liberal talking points on Iraq, try reading a little history about Saddam and Iraq prior to 2003. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
![]() |
Tags |
mccain, obama, politics |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|