BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
Only if they were straight robots, don't you get it?
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Only if they were straight robots, don't you get it?
diamond said:
No.
Please elaborate.
dbs
Don't continue to be an idiot...diamond said:I think it's talking about humans marrying robots.
So, you guys think it ok for a human to marry a robot be it- a gay human, or a straight human?
dbs
BonoVoxSupastar said:You should look into it, maybe you can deprogram one down to your intellect.
financeguy said:
The Devil's Advocate thread was closed for at lot less than this.
Some posters seem to get away with comments like the above more than others.
Just sayin'.
yolland said:This is not a thread for discussing human-robot marriages, diamond.
diamond said:
It is a thread about redifining the meaning of the word marriage though, and that was my point.
dbs
diamond said:
It is a thread about redifining the meaning of the word marriage though, and that was my point.
dbs
unico said:i can't believe i'm feeding this discussion...
i don't understand the purpose of marrying a robot. obviously robots do not have rights. so one isn't looking to share property, accounts, last will and testament, child custody or anything.
i honestly don't understand how this is even relevant.
eta: oops, yolland beat me to it
yolland
unico said:all this debate over marriage. and how many of us walk the talk we give??? how many are REALLY going to vote for the candidate who DOES believe that all are equal and believes that love defines marriage and will create legislation in support of that? how many are REALLY going to vote for a candidate that is pro-gay marriage?
Moonlit_Angel said:And any candidate from any party that says that, they'll get my support.
financeguy said:Even if you disagree with every single one of their other stances?
Moonlit_Angel said:
I'd just love for once to see a Democrat (or a Republican, it certainly isn't implausible) come right out and say, "Yes, I support same-sex marriage and I will work to make sure that it is legal."
diamond said:It is a thread about redifining the meaning of the word marriage though, and that was my point.
dbs
yolland said:chickens, cockroaches, cyborgs, blades of grass or what the hell else.
Moonlit_Angel said:Thank you for that link, unico . I've heard a bit about this guy in the past...looking at that link right now I think it's safe to say that, unless somebody else really winds up convincing me they should be the one I vote for, this is the guy who's gonna have my vote . I really like what I'm reading here.
Angela
financeguy said:
The Devil's Advocate thread was closed for at lot less than this.
Some posters seem to get away with comments like the above more than others.
Just sayin'.
phillyfan26 said:I've yet to hear a single secular argument about it. Not a single, solitary one.
INDY500 said:
"act(ing) as though a gay person is a lesser person than I"